John Rose said:
> Prob. is only he can read the code! LOL
Today I have been porting more JavaScript AI into Forth.
MP said:
> I’ve honestly tried reading his source and explanations.
Thank you for looking into it.
Mike Archbold said:
> Roll on Arthur...
http://ai.neocites.org/var.html -- now is
Most interesting. So, the timespace continuum is effectively being split? I
don't buy it. You cannot sustainably entangle one and not the other, not even
as an antithesical exercise. You're just begging for your data to disappear
into the Void.
From:
Jim, I think for this kind of reasoning to evolve, one would always have to
return to an ontological platform. For example, for reasoning, one would
require a meta-methodology for reasoning effectively with. For selectively
forgetting and learning, an evolution-based methodology is required.
Ehm, "chunking out code"...that's ah, yeah good way to describe it
I agree. Arthur, you need to elevate yourself man. The Elon Musk's of the world
are stealing all the thunder.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Archbold via AGI
>
> At least A.T. Murray is in the trenches
At least A.T. Murray is in the trenches chunking out code, unlike all
of our celebrities like Elon Musk and Bill Gates who, while they may
have more money, just write about it! Roll on Arthur...
On 6/21/18, MP via AGI wrote:
> I’ve honestly tried reading his source and explanations.
>
> He loses
Jim, I see what you mean about symbols vs other discrete data and
structures etc. I suppose an "unreadable" piece of data could still be
converted into symbols, though. An analogy would be that when we input
a sound, it is converted to something, a percept... an AGI could input
some unreadable
I’ve honestly tried reading his source and explanations.
He loses me at these "perpendicular mental fiber" stuff.
Even with my cruddy JavaScript to Java translation I still don’t get it... but
it’s something. At least it talks through a ton of weird code.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Thu,
Oh OK everybody you can throw away your keyboards, Mentifex created the first
AGI...
Prob. is only he can read the code! LOL
John
--
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
Here are a more blockchain distributed computing videos. Applicable? Maybe.
Entertaining? Yes.
The networks are probably laggy since some just use unused machine resources
like BOINC but allow buying and selling via coins or tokens. But not every AGI
component needs hyper low-latency computing
Symbol Based Reasoning is discrete, but a computer can use discrete
data that would not make sense to us so the term symbolic might be
misleading. I am not opposed to weighted reasoning (like neural
networks or Bayesian Networks) and I think reasoning has to use
networks of relations. If weighted
A few thoughts...
Seems the "disconnect" Jim mentioned, might reside in the knowing part, the
consciousness, and not our actions and our thoughts.
This morning I was observing an old (highly-experienced cat walking around
objects on a table. The cat had known this table for the most part of
So, by "discrete reasoning" I think you kind of mean more or less "not
neural networks" or I think some people say, or used to say NOT "soft
computing" to mean, oh hell!, we aren't really sure how it works, or
we can't create what looks like a clear, more or less deterministic
program like in the
12 matches
Mail list logo
