Truly though, nope; The measure for intelligence and finding Life in space is:
patterns. When we search for what is intelligence/Life, we are not looking for
randomness. So the higher the pattern score, the more intelligent/ Life you
have created. But yes Lossless Compression may not cover all
It was also look like Terminator T3000, foglets.
--
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T5b93285ffd2fa72a-Me31a29ae17b7b468075ebbff
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
Says right on openAI.com there is thousands of people using GPT already, they
have a big base. There have tons of products already, or ready to be at least.
They have books, RL gyms, the big algorithms, papers, google as their friend,
etc.
Google too has many products.
The final evolution of
Jim: "Agie, regulatory capture all governments for me, m'kay?"
Agie: "I'm sorry Jim, I'm already wireheaded."
On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 2:32 AM Robert Levy wrote:
> Yes, that was the main idea, interesting thoughts. One direction of where
> I was going with that is reasoning something like
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021, 1:09 PM wrote:
> I thought all you needed was a good lossless compression score.
>
For a language model, yes. Compression is equivalent to the Turing test but
gives you an objective, precise number. But there is more to intelligence
and labor automation than language.
Yes, that was the main idea, interesting thoughts. One direction of where
I was going with that is reasoning something like looking for a dyson
sphere blocking a distant sun. You might detect that someone has cracked
AGI via some terrestrial economic version of that.
But it would be preferable
