A very-smart developer might come along one day with an holistic enough view -
and the scientific knowledge - to surprise everyone here with a workable model
of an AGI.
However, having worked with many-a developer in a solution engineering sense,
and starting off myself as one decades ago, I ca
We don't have any way of measuring IQs much over 150 because of the problem
of the tested knowing more than the tester. So when we talk about the
intelligence of the universe, we can only really measure it's computing
power, which we generally correlate with prediction power as a measure of
intelli
The OpenCog atomspace was the data structure to hold the knowledge base,
but it was never filled with knowledge. We have no idea how it would
perform when it was filled with sufficient data for AGI, or how we would go
about filling it, or how much effort it would take, or even how big it
would have
I thought the "atomspace" was the ~knowledge base?
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 2:54 PM Matt Mahoney wrote:
> It could be that everyone still on this list has a different idea on how
> to solve AGI, making any kind of team effort impossible. I recall a few
> years back that Ben was hiring developers i
It could be that everyone still on this list has a different idea on how to
solve AGI, making any kind of team effort impossible. I recall a few years
back that Ben was hiring developers in Ethiopia.
I don't know much about Hyperon. I really haven't seen much of anything
since the 2009 OpenCog pup
Expressing the intelligence of the universe is a unique case, verses say
expressing the intelligence of an agent like a human mind. A human mind is very
lossy verses the universe where there is theoretically no loss. If lossy and
lossless were a duality then the universe would be a singularity o
On Thursday, May 02, 2024, at 6:03 AM, YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤) wrote:
> It's not easy to prove new theorems in category theory or categorical
> logic... though one open problem may be the formulation of fuzzy toposes.
Or perhaps neutrosophic topos, Florentin Smarandache has written much
interest
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 9:56 AM Matt Mahoney wrote:
> ...
> Prediction measures intelligence. Compression measures prediction.
>
Beautiful Aphorism!
The aphorism captures both of AIXI's components: AIT (Compression) and SDT
(Prediction).
The only specious quibble left for the anti-intelligence
