Hahaha
Like the Hutter Prize hasn't been out there as the most principled test of
intelligence for, what?
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 9:28 PM Keyvan M. Sadeghi <
keyvan.m.sade...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A previous post on this forum proved no one here really cares about
> testing or achieving AGI. A
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:34 PM Rob Freeman
wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:02 PM James Bowery wrote:
> > ...
> > You correctly perceive that the symbolic regression presentation is not
> to the point regarding the HNet paper. A big failing of the symbolic
> regression world is the same as
Rob
Yes, I understand the difference between a video and a paper. I did not
think John criticized it either. If he had, it's helathy to render
critique. You referenced the paper, and it remains relevant to the topic,
regardless of the medium accessed.
Indeed, I was referring to your decoupling po
Not sure who you mean to say that too but,
I'm far from saying I am the best human, or even the key that unlocks a better
human than me.
I think many others even think like that too.
I am still a human, and know a lot about AI, though.
--
Artificial Gener
> Not sure who you mean to say that too but,
>
Not directed at you at all. Was just complaining since that's most of what
happens on this list. Apart from sharing papers occasionally, most emails
are either nagging about a subject, or worshipping false gods.
I'm far from saying I am the best huma
James,
Not sure whether all that means you think category theory might be
useful for AI or not.
Anyway, I was moved to post those examples by Rich Hickey and Bartoz
Milewsky in my first post to this thread, by your comment that ideas
of indeterminate categories might annoy what you called 'the ri
