Re: [agi] True AI limitations

Sure it is. Plenty of people, who demand rights, are currently denied rights. We've denied rights from each other since before writing was invented and still do. If we found aliens tomorrow we'd start denying them rights immediately. No reason to think anything else is different. On Wed, Nov

Re: [agi] TrueAGI

USPTO search for "trueagi" shows no trademark. On Mon, Jan 3, 2022, 07:28 stefan.reich.maker.of.eye via AGI < agi@agi.topicbox.com> wrote: > So is there a registered trademark too or just Intarweb URLs? > *Artificial General Intelligence List * > / AGI / see

Re: [agi] TrueAGI

Trueagi.com redirects to a dead Google sites link. On Mon, Jan 3, 2022, 08:33 Keith Brawner wrote: > USPTO search for "trueagi" shows no trademark. > > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022, 07:28 stefan.reich.maker.of.eye via AGI < > agi@agi.topicbox.com> wrote: > >>

Re: [agi] TrueAGI

found, you have to make it easier. A registered trademark or clear whois goes a long way here. On Mon, Jan 3, 2022, 08:34 Keith Brawner wrote: > Trueagi.com redirects to a dead Google sites link. > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022, 08:33 Keith Brawner > wrote: > >> USPTO search f

Re: [agi] Standard Model of AGI

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322123676_A_Standard_Model_of_the_Mind_Toward_a_Common_Computational_Framework_across_Artificial_Intelligence_Cognitive_Science_Neuroscience_and_Robotics ? On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 8:22 AM A.T. Murray wrote: > If physics can have a standard model, then

Re: [agi] Re: Missing Data

Long-time lurker first time commenter: This is easily the strangest E-mail thread I have ever seen. On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 8:43 AM wrote: > exponential compression gives alot less than 10%, its > 0.0001% the size. > *Artificial General Intelligence List