Re: [agi] AGI speedrun continues

Yes > On Jan 23, 2020, at 8:42 PM, stefan.reich.maker.of.eye via AGI > wrote: > > You guys are really bad at cheering, aren't you? > Artificial General Intelligence List / AGI > / see discussions + participants >

[agi] Re: a5c5

Hey, I’m also able to create an autoresponder How awesome am I? Wooo I got rid of jobs, give me millions of USD On 30. Nov 2019, at 17:27, digikar via AGI wrote: > I am a third year student pursuing a Bachelors in Computer Science and > Engineering, and have been wanting to get

[agi] Re: 948c

Hey, I’m also able to create an autoresponder How awesome am I? Wooo I got rid of jobs, give me millions of USD On 1. Dec 2019, at 21:27, Alan Grimes via AGI wrote: > Today, I'm going to do something different again and sketch out the > development rig I would really like. and

[agi] Re: Re: a5c5

Hey, I’m also able to create an autoresponder How awesome am I? Wooo I got rid of jobs, give me millions of USD On 2. Dec 2019, at 19:18, Eugene Surowitz via AGI wrote: > You might take a look at Pei Wang's NARS system; > an 'Open NARS' system is available. > > On 11/30/2019

[agi] Re: Re: a5c5

Hey, I’m also able to create an autoresponder How awesome am I? Wooo I got rid of jobs, give me millions of USD On 3. Dec 2019, at 19:52, digikar via AGI wrote: > Okay, there have been a lot of responses - thank you to all! > > I don't mean to be critical but AGI is a really

[agi] Re: Re: a5c5

Hey, I’m also able to create an autoresponder How awesome am I? Wooo I got rid of jobs, give me millions of USD On 4. Dec 2019, at 22:36, Eugene Surowitz via AGI wrote: > Matt's comment on not being able to open the PDFs > reminded me to try again after Firefox detected invalid

[agi] Re: Re: Re: 83d8

Hey, I’m also able to create an autoresponder How awesome am I? Wooo I got rid of jobs, give me millions of USD On 5. Dec 2019, at 19:03, digikar via AGI wrote: > May be screen recording + microphone. > > Or just presentation slides + separate audio file. > > PS: I am wanting

Re: [agi] Ruby Question producing AI without neural networks (just plain coding)

Sadly, repl.it doesn't provide a creation date, otherwise I could tell you the exact day that I originally "sent" the first email in this thread. It's probably 3-5 weeks ago. On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:04 AM Manuel Korfmann wrote: > Oh, also big disclaimer: The initial email w

Re: [agi] Ruby Question producing AI without neural networks (just plain coding)

Oh, also big disclaimer: The initial email was sent on 16 october, but I originally "sent" it a big while ago, just my mac email program wasn't authenticated with google until 16. october. That probably explains why I'm so lost in my own code. On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:03 AM Manue

Re: [agi] Ruby Question producing AI without neural networks (just plain coding)

fan Reich < > stefan.reich.maker.of@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> There was no attack in what I posted whatsoever. I just wanted to know >> how your AI experiment works >> >> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 23:52, Manuel Korfmann wrote: >> >>> Please

Re: [agi] Ruby Question producing AI without neural networks (just plain coding)

of the context word array, a neural network decides between to words based on the first letter On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:51 PM Manuel Korfmann wrote: > Please be more specific in your questioning or less "ironic" when I don't > correctly guess what you were questioning about. &

Re: [agi] Ruby Question producing AI without neural networks (just plain coding)

specifics to be laughed at by you or other readers before I stated: This was a one night experiment, not much thought was put into it. On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:19 PM Stefan Reich via AGI wrote: > Uh... what? I thought it's a question producing AI > > On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 22:47, Man

Re: [agi] Ruby Question producing AI without neural networks (just plain coding)

It would be a library to be included in the server-side code as well as the client-side code. The library would plug into the error reporting/exception system of the technology used on the server-side or client-side. In my case, that would by Rails (Ruby) and JavaScript (Chrome). Then it would

Re: [agi] Ruby Question producing AI without neural networks (just plain coding)

Is HTM exactly like deep learning? Btw: What do you people think of a source code versioning system, that automatically saves tagged versions when the program is run by the developer and no errors are in the web server terminal log + in the javascript browser console log? PS Grammar.ly shows

Re: [agi] Ruby Question producing AI without neural networks (just plain coding)

Oh, it's currently failing, sorry about that. On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 4:18 PM Manuel Korfmann wrote: > Click on "Run" and observe the log output on the right side of the screen. > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 4:13 PM Stefan Reich via AGI > wrote: > >> How do I use i

Re: [agi] Ruby Question producing AI without neural networks (just plain coding)

Click on "Run" and observe the log output on the right side of the screen. On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 4:13 PM Stefan Reich via AGI wrote: > How do I use it? > > # 15 implement Numenta HTM > > Numenta was impressive stuff back in the day. > > On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 a

[agi] Ruby Question producing AI without neural networks (just plain coding)

https://repl.it/@LemonAndroid/SphericalSurprisedKnowledge -- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tbf030efda3f5cc86-M2ef0d71ca89cc79404abaf33

Re: [agi] Fwd: Women Techmakers list: "moinblockchain 19 - for digital equality award ceremony city hall sign up today!"

When will you unblock me Stefan? On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 11:55 PM Stefan Reich via AGI wrote: > I am under the impression that some local tech events in my area are > completely evil. 230 €? City hall reception? What is it, an idiot parade? > Besides, Blockchain is simply useless. Oh, and

[agi] Chemistry

1 https://medium.com/@manu_78098/creating-technical-nerves-967d077a69fa?sk=e362cc952d632c182eee60cf81dd65be 2 https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/246306-hacked-together-mindstorms-bot-kit-bringing-science-classroom-near

Re: [agi] Russian robots

Thx Sending humanoid robots to space seems like a highly intelligent idea for testing human space travel safely. > On 24. Aug 2019, at 09:58, Secretary of Trades > wrote: > > The russian humanoid robot > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Az_qrXQzYOA

[agi] https://globe.ai/

-- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T9c610c9b48795591-M0d92d57a43105e836472a290 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Re: [agi] can anyone here code a physics engine?

Awesome. E mail Check oud ma twidda Twitter.com/LemonAndroid > On 6. Aug 2019, at 17:22, Berick Cook wrote: > > OpenAI's Gym has several open source, physics based test environments. > Including pendulums and robotics simulations. > > https://gym.openai.com/envs/

Re: [agi] Mentifex Roadmap to AGI

@mentifex. Where is your ai? > On 6. Aug 2019, at 13:38, A.T. Murray wrote: > > [1993-07-23] Creation of MindRexx artificial intelligence in English. > > [1998-01-20] Creation of MindForth artificial intelligence in English. > > [2001-08-24] Creation of AgiMind artificial general

Re: [agi] Any more input today?

https://blog.blazingdb.com/blazingsql-is-now-open-source-b859d342ec20 <https://blog.blazingdb.com/blazingsql-is-now-open-source-b859d342ec20> > On 5. Aug 2019, at 23:50, Manuel Korfmann wrote: > > >> IDEAS Build >> CODE Measure >> DATA Learn >> >>

Re: [agi] Any more input today?

@Ben Goertzel Maybe you want to add your free.ai to the template I posted. There is a spot for you to fill it in. Just search for “Ben”. Life’s Good > On 5. Aug 2019, at 22:44, Manuel Korfmann wrote: > > Hey jess > >> On 5. Aug 2019, at 22:40, wangj...@umich.edu <mail

Re: [agi] Any more input today?

> IDEAS Build > CODE Measure > DATA Learn > > https://www.twitch.tv/twitchplaysrobotics build something on top of this Google vision api scraper robot of which color moves the most Color of the robot that moves most

Re: [agi] Any more input today?

Hey jess > On 5. Aug 2019, at 22:40, wangj...@umich.edu wrote: > > hi all :D N > Artificial General Intelligence List / AGI > / see discussions + participants > + delivery

Re: [agi] Any more input today?

> On 5. Aug 2019, at 22:19, Manuel Korfmann wrote: > > IDEAS Build > CODE Measure > DATA Learn > > https://www.twitch.tv/twitchplaysrobotics <https://www.twitch.tv/twitchplaysrobotics> build something on top of this Google vision api scraper

Re: [agi] Any more input today?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORwooppLi8U <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORwooppLi8U> > On 5. Aug 2019, at 22:19, Manuel Korfmann wrote: > > IDEAS Build > CODE Measure > DATA Learn > > > > IDEAS

Re: [agi] Any more input today?

CODE Measure DATA Learn IDEAS Build CODE Measure DATA Learn IDEAS Build CODE Measure DATA Learn IDEAS Build CODE Measure DATA Learn > On 5. Aug 2019, at 22:13, Manuel Korfmann wrote: > > GO GO GOGO GOGO > >> On 5. Aug 2019, at 22:12, Manuel Korfmann > <mailto:m.

[agi] Any more input today?

Stop chilling Start building FASTER Spinning LEAN Startup 101 -- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T0cd57b9c4779e483-M9d26a27d4c10ef913d9ca397 Delivery options:

Re: [agi] How about a Markov chain to convert neural networks to Markov chains, then every step of action could be understood by a human or?

I’m thinking. About the ALPHA GO thing. Go has how many possible actions? Couldn’t that be converted into a Markov chain? Is a Markov chain even the thing I really want (I’m unsure If it’s deterministic 100%, since it involves greedy randomness). Do you follow the overall idea tho? Love

Re: [agi] can anyone here code a physics engine?

Physics At it’s simplest level is simple Non-measurables Measurables Qants Atoms What Qants are made of etc.

Re: [agi] Narrow AGI

handle > (in the future, not that far yet) the smarter the whole works > potentially would get, and the easier it is to add new narrow > functions which are increasingly less narrow. I'm trying to advance my > theory along with the code. > > >> >> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019

[agi] pain.iq

https://twitter.com/LemonAndroid/status/1158279591636668416 -- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink:

[agi] How about a Markov chain to convert neural networks to Markov chains, then every step of action could be understood by a human or?

https://twitter.com/LemonAndroid/status/1158257805708681216 How about a Markov chain to convert neural networks to Markov chains, then every step of action could be understood by a human or?

Re: [agi] AJI

https://satin-dew-1.glitch.me/ > On 5. Aug 2019, at 00:45, Alan Grimes via AGI wrote: > > Secretary of Trades wrote: >> When it's not even able to run a robot simulator, but gives ears to the >> wall and eyes to the bike, it's called an Artificially Junk Idiocy

Re: [agi] Central retaliation

P E A C E ∑ > On 4. Aug 2019, at 15:28, Stefan Reich via AGI wrote: > > You're out of touch, the age of war is ending > > On Sun, 4 Aug 2019 at 15:17, Secretary of Trades > wrote: > Forms of retaliation against distributed

Re: [agi] AGI Python library

Doesn’t matter. First and foremast you just have to participate in chat to stay core dev. -- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tf98655bbfa70364b-Mfdd5a741be5737fb65ca8d68 Delivery options:

Re: [agi] AGI Python library

Danko: You want to be core dev on our discord (Stefan & mine)? Freeze > On 2. Aug 2019, at 12:55, Danko Nikolic wrote: > > It must have ran away too. > > Danko > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 12:36 PM Stefan Reich via AGI > wrote: > I can't find this library :-( >

Re: [agi] Controlled AI

Always blame the system, think at scale. > On 1. Aug 2019, at 00:46, Costi Dumitrescu wrote: > > Senator, should you do it we'll call it possible. And not otherwise > > > https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jun/18/angela-merkel-blames-dehydration-for-shakes > > > On 31.07.2019 12:27,

Re: [agi] My paper in AGI-19

the idea(s) to a broad audience. > Exactly! Thanks. > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 1:29 PM Manuel Korfmann <mailto:m...@korfmann.info>> wrote: > > >> On 31. Jul 2019, at 23:03, Matt Mahoney > <mailto:mattmahone...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Not underst

Re: [agi] My paper in AGI-19

> On 31. Jul 2019, at 23:03, Matt Mahoney wrote: > > Not understanding the math is the reader's problem. Starving is the starving person's problem. -- Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink:

Re: [agi] Controlled AI

Someone could think it would be good to control a CNC machine with an AGI for example while humans also still operate it. It’s like with all new things, it should be tried with great care. Simulated first and only used passively (like non-destructive) firstly. > On 31. Jul 2019, at 20:48,

Re: [agi] My paper in AGI-19

I guess he meant: It’s difficult to understand all these mathematical equations. Visualizations are better at transporting ideas in a way that almost everyone can understand easily. > On 31. Jul 2019, at 13:46, Mohammadreza Alidoust > wrote: > > Thank you for reading my paper. I wish you