But, yes, it is a terrible argument.
On 6/22/18, Mike Archbold wrote:
> Giacomo: OK. But neither one has a working AGI.
> Mike
>
> On 6/22/18, Giacomo Spigler via AGI wrote:
>> Mike,
>>
>> I think this is a terrible argument. We are not in kindergarten and we do
>> not get prizes for the
Giacomo: OK. But neither one has a working AGI.
Mike
On 6/22/18, Giacomo Spigler via AGI wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I think this is a terrible argument. We are not in kindergarten and we do
> not get prizes for the effort or for trying.
>
> Arthur's code is of poor quality and of highly dubious
John Rose said:
> Prob. is only he can read the code! LOL
Today I have been porting more JavaScript AI into Forth.
MP said:
> I’ve honestly tried reading his source and explanations.
Thank you for looking into it.
Mike Archbold said:
> Roll on Arthur...
http://ai.neocites.org/var.html -- now is
Ehm, "chunking out code"...that's ah, yeah good way to describe it
I agree. Arthur, you need to elevate yourself man. The Elon Musk's of the world
are stealing all the thunder.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Archbold via AGI
>
> At least A.T. Murray is in the trenches
At least A.T. Murray is in the trenches chunking out code, unlike all
of our celebrities like Elon Musk and Bill Gates who, while they may
have more money, just write about it! Roll on Arthur...
On 6/21/18, MP via AGI wrote:
> I’ve honestly tried reading his source and explanations.
>
> He loses
I’ve honestly tried reading his source and explanations.
He loses me at these "perpendicular mental fiber" stuff.
Even with my cruddy JavaScript to Java translation I still don’t get it... but
it’s something. At least it talks through a ton of weird code.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Thu,
Oh OK everybody you can throw away your keyboards, Mentifex created the first
AGI...
Prob. is only he can read the code! LOL
John
--
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink:
