At 18:40 17.11.02 -0500, Ben wrote:
>
>Alex, I've appreciated your messages and hope you'll continue to post.
I know cyc and i dont like it, mainly because its too expensive.
I like a modern painting Aunt Pollys fence more, aka user generated content.
I'll still lurking here and if something new
Alex, I've appreciated your messages and hope you'll continue to post.
Alan, let's try to keep the tone a little more pleasant huh? Criticizing
Alex's work is perfectly appropriate, but just saying "I don't like it
because it reminds me of Cyc" isn't really a meaningful criticism.
[Especially be
At 17:45 17.11.02 -0800, you wrote:
>If this had been posted to my "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ML, I would
>have declared it in violation of my NO CYC policy and put the sender on
>notice. =\
I am looking for some AGI-people to cooperate and funding their work (we
are earning money with our software). To
Alex,
There is a big leap from rule-based NLP to statistical, machine-learning
based NLP. Your group has taken that leap, which is great. Incorporating
feedback from human chatters is a nifty variation on the stats/ML approach,
but still in my view within that approach.
I think there's anothe
If this had been posted to my "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ML, I would
have declared it in violation of my NO CYC policy and put the sender on
notice. =\
[sender's name omitted to save him some emberasment].
> At 15:56 17.11.02 -0500, Ben wrote:
> >...
> >a) learning about language (how to comprehend & p
At 15:56 17.11.02 -0500, Ben wrote:
>...
>a) learning about language (how to comprehend & produce it)
We are using data from our human2human chat rooms, this data is used to
train a hidden markov model supertagger.
We train 2 things normal utterances and discourse.
It learnes about things a user
> We are developing QA-add-ons for our chat-software, we need semi-automatic
> knowledge extraction. We have 1-2 years to build qa-stuff, imho its
> AGI-ish. We use CLIPS, NARS-ideas and MuliNet. Its slow, today
> 30s/sentence
> on 1 GHz PC.
At what stage do you reckon you'll have a system that
At 12:13 17.11.02 -0500, Ben wrote:
>
>* time to development
>* cost of development [more time and more expertise are needed]
>
>Thus, commercial deployment of AGI or even AGI-ish technologies is naturally
>going to be limited to areas where the quality of behavior provided by
>narrow AI systems ju
> >Well hey, if you guys ever want to seriously collaborate with an
> AGI team,
> >let me know ;)
>
> Sure, but this is imho 6-12 months away, because at the moment
> narrow-AI is
> much easier and lucrative for us. I'am sure, that we'll reach the day when
> AGI is cheaper than narrow-AI.
I don't
At 10:22 17.11.02 -0500, Ben wrote:
>...
>> Thats why i look more and more into AGI.
>
>Well hey, if you guys ever want to seriously collaborate with an AGI team,
>let me know ;)
Sure, but this is imho 6-12 months away, because at the moment narrow-AI is
much easier and lucrative for us. I'am sure
> We are implementing a multi-languange chat-system, every chatter
> writes and
> talks in his native-language, because low-quality translation is fast and
> easy.
...
> Thats why i look more and more into AGI.
>
Well hey, if you guys ever want to seriously collaborate with an AGI team,
let me kn
At 07:54 17.11.02 -0500, you wrote:
>...
>I feel that eventually, once the comp. ling. community beats the statistics
>and machine learning approach to death, they'll start to get a little
>interested in experiential learning -- i.e. in having language analysis
>programs learn thru interaction with
Pei wrote:
> > I continue to believe that "degree of generality of scope" is a
> meaningful
> > qualifier to apply to intelligent system, so that we can speak about
> narrow
> > AI vs. general AI.
>
> I agree, though I think the difference in scope is secondary. To me, the
> primary difference is
Ben said:
>
> The article contains the quote:
>
> **
> "David Yarowsky, associate professor of computer science, co-leads the
> Natural Language Processing, or NLP, research group. "A lot of people in
> computer science don't worry about whether computers think, or what
> qualifies as intelligence,
> The current (November 2002) issue of Johns Hopkins Magazine has
> an article
> about research on computerized language translation, available at
> http://www.jhu.edu/~jhumag/1102web/language.html .
The article contains the quote:
**
"David Yarowsky, associate professor of computer science, c
The current (November 2002) issue of Johns Hopkins Magazine has an article
about research on computerized language translation, available at
http://www.jhu.edu/~jhumag/1102web/language.html .
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to
16 matches
Mail list logo
