Re: [agi] Fwd: Numenta Newsletter: March 20, 2007

2007-03-22 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 08:57:01PM -0700, David Clark wrote: I put up with 1 person out of all the thousands of emails I get who insisted on sending standard text messages as a attachment. Because of virus Um, no. Mine are standard http://rfc.net/rfc2015.html digitally signed messages. If

Re: [agi] Fwd: Numenta Newsletter: March 20, 2007

2007-03-22 Thread rooftop8000
You're just hoping you only have to do one thing so you can forget about all the other stuff that is required. No. I don't think that other stuff required can be done. This is the same reason I don't subscribe to SENS. I thought this was unlikely when I was a 15 year old, and I still

RE: [agi] Fwd: Numenta Newsletter: March 20, 2007

2007-03-22 Thread DEREK ZAHN
Rooftop8000 writes: Yes, but software doesn't need to see or walk around because it lives inside a computer. Why aren't you putting in echo-location or knowing how to flaps wings? In my opinion, those would be viable things to include in a proto-AGI. They don't lead as directly to

Re: [agi] My proposal for an AGI agenda

2007-03-22 Thread Charles D Hixson
Chuck Esterbrook wrote: On 3/20/07, Charles D Hixson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: rooftop8000 wrote: ... I think we should somehow allow people to use all the program languages they want. That somehow is the big problem. Most approaches to dealing with it are...lamentable. ... You can use

Re: [agi] My proposal for an AGI agenda

2007-03-22 Thread Chuck Esterbrook
On 3/22/07, Charles D Hixson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately, MS is claiming undefined things as being proprietary. As such, I intend to stay totally clear of implementations of it's protocols. Including mono. I am considering jvm, however, as Sun has now freed the java license (and

Re: [agi] My proposal for an AGI agenda

2007-03-22 Thread Charles D Hixson
Chuck Esterbrook wrote: On 3/22/07, Charles D Hixson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately, MS is claiming undefined things as being proprietary. As such, I intend to stay totally clear of implementations of it's protocols. Including mono. I am considering jvm, however, as Sun has now freed

RE: [agi] My proposal for an AGI agenda

2007-03-22 Thread John Rose
Enhancements to existing computer languages or new computer languages that could possibly grease the wheels for AGI development would be aligning the language more closely to mathematics. Many of the computer languages are the same old things rehashed in different though new and evolutionarily

Re: [agi] My proposal for an AGI agenda

2007-03-22 Thread Kevin Peterson
On 3/22/07, John Rose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Enhancements to existing computer languages or new computer languages that could possibly grease the wheels for AGI development would be aligning the language more closely to mathematics. Many of the computer languages are [...] This would be

Re: [agi] My proposal for an AGI agenda

2007-03-22 Thread Chuck Esterbrook
Sun has a fairly new language called Fortress that is targeted to scientists and engineers, and it has stronger notions of built-in math than your typical OO language. I don't know (and probably doubt) that it has the group/ring theory, category theory, etc. that you're looking for, but you can