Perhaps there is a shortcut to all of this.

Provide the AGI with the hardware and software to jack into one or more human
brains and let the bio-software of the human brain be the language interface development tool.

I think we are creating  some of this the hardware.

This also puts AGI in a position to become reliant on humans to interface with other  humans and perhaps also allows an AGI to learn the virtues of carbon technology and the value of
continuing relationships with humans.

Some of the drivers that bring humans together  such as social relations and sexual relations perhaps can be learned by an AGI and  perhaps we can pussywhip
an antisocial AGI into a friendly AGI.

Remember the KISS rule , sometimes you can focus only on key areas with
enormous complexity and later discover that the result is far more simple than
originally envisioned.

Morris



On 10/31/06, John Scanlon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One of the major obstacles to real AI is the belief that knowledge of a natural language is necessary for intelligence.  A human-level intelligent system should be expected to have the ability to learn a natural language, but it is not necessary.  It is better to start with a formal language, with unambiguous formal syntax, as the primary interface between human beings and AI systems.  This type of language could be called a "para-natural formal language."  It eliminates all of the syntactical ambiguity that makes competent use of a natural language so difficult to implement in an AI system.  Such a language would also be a member of the class "fifth generation computer language."
 

This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to