e
From: Tudor Boloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 11:54:19 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] Compression PLUS a fitness function "motoring" for
hypothesized compressibility is intelligence?
Jim, these are good points, and seem to be saying tha
s of reasoning in the design of an AI program.
>
> Jim Bromer
>
> - Original Message
> From: "J Storrs Hall, PhD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: agi@v2.listbox.com
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 11:12:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [agi] Compression PLUS a fitness
ous good reasons for including other means
of reasoning in the design of an AI program.
Jim Bromer
- Original Message
From: "J Storrs Hall, PhD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 11:12:54 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] Compression PL
I don't really have any argument with this, except possibly quibbles about the
nuances of the difference between "empirical" and "empiricism" -- and I don't
really care about those!
On Friday 30 May 2008 05:04:58 am, Tudor Boloni wrote:
> The key point was lost, here is a clearer way of saying i
The key point was lost, here is a clearer way of saying it.
Kepler's experience (his empirical work and experimentation with all his
equipment) IS NOT what helped him DISCOVER properties of gravity (equal
times for equal areas) (we can agree no one Invented it, though Newton
generalized Kepler's i
Huh? Kepler was the guy who theorized that the planets lived on spheres whose
sizes were determined by nesting of the Platonic solids. Later, finding that
the orbits didn't fit the spheres, he finally struck on the idea that the
orbits were ellipses. He believed that the motion of the planets w
Josh, IF we remove the empiricism bias in "future sensory histories" (think
Kepler and the approach he took to discover gravity, such as: what can
explain observed patterns, knowing our mind is always BLINDED by the senses
(similar to zen teachings), he had to negate the tendency to build a
hypothe
