Vladimir Nesov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org wrote:
I happened to use CopyCat in a university AI class I taught years ago, so I
got some experience with it
It was **great** as a teaching tool, but I wouldn't say it shows anything
about what can or can't
[repost from opencog list; I should've posted it on AGI in the first
place, instead of opencog]
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org wrote:
First thing: CopyCat doesn't work. Not just in the sense that it's not AGI
... in the sense that it can't even solve hardly
I happened to use CopyCat in a university AI class I taught years ago, so I
got some experience with it
It was **great** as a teaching tool, but I wouldn't say it shows anything
about what can or can't work for AGI, really...
ben
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org wrote:
I happened to use CopyCat in a university AI class I taught years ago, so I
got some experience with it
It was **great** as a teaching tool, but I wouldn't say it shows anything
about what can or can't work for AGI,
Do you mean that examples that Hofstadter/Mitchell used in their
papers for CopyCat did not in fact work on their codebase? I remember
downloading second copycat implementations (in Java IIRC), it seemed
to be working. Besides, they don't claim anything grandiose for this
model, and it seems