Hi all,
Since there was recently discussion about machine languages, including
Lojban, here is a comic that pokes a bit of fun at Lojban (Plus if you
click on the image you get the comic in Lojban).
http://xkcd.com/c191.html
Enjoy :)
--
-Joel
Unless you try to do something beyond what you
That's right... I need to update the AGIRI site to reflect the replacement of Loglish with Lojban++, which is a better thought out proposal along the same conceptual linesSee the document
http://www.goertzel.org/papers/lojbanplusplus.pdffor information on the Lojban++ project, which I think is a
Hi all,
I have spent some time recently mulling over the details of a
partially-new language for communicating between humans and AI's. The
language is (tentatively) called Lojban++ and is described here:
http://www.goertzel.org/papers/lojbanplusplus.pdf
Of course, I don't think that a
Hey Luke,
An interesting thought just occurred to me...
Your Speagram programming-language parser is quite general and can deal with
any formally-specifiable syntax, and you've made it deal with some simple
English-like syntax... (www.speagram.org). Furthermore it outputs files in
the Combo
After tinkering with artificial languages for years:
http://www.mail-archive.com/agi@v2.listbox.com/msg00374.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/alicebot-general@alice.sunlitsurf.com/msg00681.h
tml
i work now with simple english, french and german in combination with
multinet.
Examples for simple
If AI can learn Lojban --- it proves nothing from strong AI standpoint.
There are a lot of VB, Pascal, C#, C++ compilers already. So what?
Those languages are programming languages, not languages for
communicating commonsense knowledge about the world.
This comment suggests that you
can be placed in a written word by punctuation,
meaning may be misunderstood.
I predict a new language will come forward.
Dan Goe
From : Ben Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To : agi@v2.listbox.com
Subject : RE: [agi] Lojban and AI
Date : Sun
Dennis,
this idea is wrong:
-
Lojban is far more similar to natural languages in both intent,
semantics and syntax than to any of the programming languages.
-
Actually Lojban is closer to programming languages than to
natural languages.
Structure of Lojban and programming
