On Dec 3, 2007 7:19 PM, Ed Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps one aspect of the AGI-at-home project would be to develop a good
generalized architecture for wedding various classes of narrow AI and AGI in
such a learning environment.
Yes, I think this is the key aspect, the meta-problem
On Dec 3, 2007 11:03 PM, Bryan Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 03 December 2007, Mike Dougherty wrote:
Another method of doing search agents, in the mean time, might be to
take neural tissue samples (or simple scanning of the brain) and try to
simulate a patch of neurons via
My suggestion, criticized below (criticism can be valuable), was for just
one of many possible uses of an open-source P2P AGI-at-home type system. I
am totally willing to hear other proposals. Considering how little time I
spent coming up with the one being criticized, I have a relatively low
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Subject: [agi] RE:P2P and/or communal AGI development [WAS
Hacker intelligence level...]
My suggestion, criticized below (criticism can be valuable),
was for just one of many possible uses of an open
On Dec 3, 2007, at 12:52 PM, John G. Rose wrote:
For some lucky cable folks the BW is getting ready to increase soon:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071130-docsis-3-0-possible-100mbps-sp
eeds-coming-to-some-comcast-users-in-2008.html
I'm yet to fully understand the limitations of a
From: J. Andrew Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Distributed algorithms tend to be far more sensitivity to latency than
bandwidth, except to the extent that low bandwidth induces latency.
As a practical matter, the latency floor of P2P is so high that most
algorithms would run far faster on
--- Ed Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And (2) with regard to the order of NL learning, I think a child actually
learns semantics first
Actually Jusczyk showed that babies learn the rules for segmenting continuous
speech at 7-10 months. I did some experiments in 1999 following the work of
On Dec 3, 2007 5:07 PM, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When a user asks a question or posts information, the message would be
broadcast to many nodes, which could choose to ignore them or relay them to
other nodes that it believes would find the message more relevant. Eventually
the
On Monday 03 December 2007, Mike Dougherty wrote:
I believe the next step of such a system is to become an abstraction
between the user and the network they're using. So if you can hook
into your P2P network via a firefox extension, (consider StumbleUpon
or Greasemonkey) so it (the agent) can
