> From: Richard Loosemore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Top three? I don't know if anyone ranks them.
>
> Try:
>
> 1) Grounding Problem (the *real* one, not the cheap substitute that
> everyone usually thinks of as the symbol grounding problem).
>
> 2) The problem of desiging an inference control
John G. Rose wrote:
From: Richard Loosemore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think this is a very important issue in AGI, which is why I felt
compelled to say something.
As you know, I keep trying to get meaningful debate to happen on the
subject of *methodology* in AGI. That is what my claims about
> From: Richard Loosemore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I think this is a very important issue in AGI, which is why I felt
> compelled to say something.
>
> As you know, I keep trying to get meaningful debate to happen on the
> subject of *methodology* in AGI. That is what my claims about the
> com
On 03/12/2007, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it is truly
> astonishing to hear people talking about issues being more or less
> solved, bar the shouting.
You'll usually find that such people never trouble themselves with
implementational details. Intuitive notions about how easy
John G. Rose wrote:
From: Richard Loosemore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is easy for a research field to agree that certain problems are
really serious and unsolved.
A hundred years ago, the results of the Michelson-Morley experiments
were a big unsolved problem, and pretty serious for the found
