the smallest set of operations that can
potentially define everything and how do you combine them ?
I watched a brain experiment last night that proved that connections
between major parts of the brain stop when you are asleep.
They put electricity at different brain points, and it went everywhere
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Michael Swan wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I'd argue that mathematical operations are unnecesary,
> > we don't even have integer support inbuilt.
> I'd disagree. ">" is a mathematical operation, and in combination can
> become an enormous number of concepts.
>
> Sure, I t
>
>
> I'd argue that mathematical operations are unnecesary,
> we don't even have integer support inbuilt.
I'd disagree. ">" is a mathematical operation, and in combination can
become an enormous number of concepts.
Sure, I think the brain is more sensibly understood in a
"programattical" sens
I watched a brain experiment last night that proved that connections
between major parts of the brain stop when you are asleep.
They put electricity at different brain points, and it went everywhere
when the person was a awake, and dissipated when they were asleep.
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 02:13 +
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 01:37 +0100, Mike Tintner wrote:
> Michael :The brains "slow and unreliable" methods I think are the price paid
> for
> generality and innately unreliable hardware
>
> Yes to one - nice to see an AGI-er finally starting to join up the dots,
> instead of simply dismissing t
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Michael Swan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 07:48 -0700, Matt Mahoney wrote:
> > Actually, Fibonacci numbers can be computed without loops or recursion.
> >
> > int fib(int x) {
> > return round(pow((1+sqrt(5))/2, x)/sqrt(5));
> > }
> ;) I know. I was wondering i
puting power
> The human brain has a lot of
> knowledge. The calculator has less knowledge, but makes up for it in speed
> and
> memory.
>
> -- Matt Mahoney, matmaho...@yahoo.com
>
>
>
> - Original Message ----
> From: Michael Swan
> To: agi
>
A demonstration of global connectedness is - associate with an " O "
I get:
number, sun, dish, disk, ball, letter, mouth, two fingers, "oh", circle,
wheel, wire coil, outline, station on metro, hole, Kenneth Noland painting,
ring, coin, roundabout
connecting among other things - language
Michael :The brains "slow and unreliable" methods I think are the price paid
for
generality and innately unreliable hardware
Yes to one - nice to see an AGI-er finally starting to join up the dots,
instead of simply dismissing the brain's massive difficulties in maintaining
a train of thought.
ichael Swan
To: agi
Sent: Wed, July 14, 2010 7:53:33 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially
define everything and how do you combine them ?
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 07:48 -0700, Matt Mahoney wrote:
> Actually, Fibonacci numbers can be computed wi
her
> > operations
> > with extremely few limited steps, and nothing remotely like the routine
> > millions to billions of current computers. It must therefore work v.
> > fundamentally differently.
> >
> > Are you saying anything significantly different
0 12:18:40 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can potentially
define everything and how do you combine them ?
Brain loops:
Premise:
Biological brain code does not contain looping constructs, or the
ability to creating looping code, (due to the fact they are
mentally differently.
>
> Are you saying anything significantly different to that?
>
> --
> From: "Michael Swan"
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 1:34 AM
> To: "agi"
> Subject: Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of op
fundamentally differently.
Are you saying anything significantly different to that?
--
From: "Michael Swan"
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 1:34 AM
To: "agi"
Subject: Re: [agi] What is the smallest set of operations that can
pot
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 07:00 -0400, Ben Goertzel wrote:
> Well, if you want a simple but complete operator set, you can go with
>
> -- Schonfinkel combinator plus two parentheses
>
I'll check this out soon.
> or
>
> -- S and K combinator plus two parentheses
>
> and I suppose you could add
>
>
Well, if you want a simple but complete operator set, you can go with
-- Schonfinkel combinator plus two parentheses
or
-- S and K combinator plus two parentheses
and I suppose you could add
-- input
-- output
-- forget
statements to this, but I'm not sure what this gets you...
Actually, add
Hi,
I'm interested in combining the simplest, "most derivable" operations
( eg operations that cannot be defined by other operations) for creating
seed AGI's. The simplest operations combined in a multitude ways can
form extremely complex patterns, but the underlying logic may be
simple.
I wonde
17 matches
Mail list logo
