The Linda example is a fallacy if all the concepts in it, as well as
the notion of probability, are all defined pure extensionally. That
is, both bank teller and feminist bank teller are defined as sets,
specified by their instances. Obviously, the latter is a subset of the
former, and is a
I don't think a betting situation will be different for this case. To
really avoid intensional considerations, experiment instructions
should be so explicit that the human subjects know exactly what they
are asked to do.
I believe that, in the betting versions of the Linda-fallacy experiment,
