Re: [agi] Language and AGI (was Re: Early Apps)

2002-12-27 Thread Jonathan Standley
- Original Message - From: "Shane Legg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 7:48 PM Subject: Re: [agi] Language and AGI (was Re: Early Apps) > > I guess people continue to do AI with languages like English > becau

RE: [agi] Language and AGI (was Re: Early Apps)

2002-12-27 Thread Ben Goertzel
humans... -- Ben -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shane Legg Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 7:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [agi] Language and AGI (was Re: Early Apps) > I suspect that Esperanto will not be much more difficult

Re: [agi] Language and AGI (was Re: Early Apps)

2002-12-27 Thread Shane Legg
I suspect that Esperanto will not be much more difficult to tackle than any current existing language, or at best a *tiny* bit easier. The greatest difficulty of language is not grammar, or spelling, punctuation, etc. To get an AGI to the point of using _any_ language "naturally" on the level hu

Re: [agi] Language and AGI (was Re: Early Apps)

2002-12-27 Thread Pei Wang
From: "Cliff Stabbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 6:11 AM > I suspect that Esperanto will not be much more difficult to tackle > than any current existing language, or at best a *tiny* bit easier. > The greatest difficulty of language is not grammar, or spelling, > punctua