> I noticed that too. Seemed like this list doesn't archive attachments
> (or has particularly good SPAM filter :-). I don't have the paper posted
> on any site. Will send you a PDF (748 KB). If others want a copy, let me
> know via email.
>
> Thanks!
>
> J. W.
Hi
Please send me a copy too, th
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter Voss
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 12:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [agi] Psychometric AI
I can't find it in the archives. Can you give me a link?
Thanks,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't find it in the archives. Can you give me a link?
Thanks,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of J. W. Johnston
...As AGI testing and validation goes, some might recall in my IVI
Architecture posted here about a year ago, I specified
particularly recommend...
-- Ben
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Shane
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 10:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [agi] Psychometric AI
Hi Ben,
You think it's a silly approach because...?
I'm jus
essage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Shane
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 10:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [agi] Psychometric AI
Hi Ben,
You think it's a silly approach because...?
I'm just about to read their paper and thus I haven
Hi Ben,
You think it's a silly approach because...?
I'm just about to read their paper and thus I haven't
formed an opinion on their approach yet myself.
Thanks
Shane
--- Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This may be of interest to someone...
>
> Psychometric AI:
>
> http://www
