On Nov 30, 2007 12:03 AM, Dennis Gorelik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Benjamin,
>
> >> That proves my point [that AGI project can be successfully split
> >> into smaller narrow AI subprojects], right?
>
> > Yes, but it's a largely irrelevant point. Because building a narrow-AI
> > system in an AGI
> So far only researchers/developers who picked narrow-AI approach
> accomplished something useful for AGI.
> E.g.: Google, computer languages, network protocols, databases.
These are tools that are useful for AGI R&D but so are computer
monitors, silicon chips, and desk chairs. Being a useful to
Benjamin,
>> That proves my point [that AGI project can be successfully split
>> into smaller narrow AI subprojects], right?
> Yes, but it's a largely irrelevant point. Because building a narrow-AI
> system in an AGI-compatible way is HARDER than building that same
> narrow-AI component in a non
