--- On Wed, 11/19/08, Daniel Yokomizo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Matt Mahoney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seed AI is a myth.
http://www.mattmahoney.net/agi2.html (section 2).
(I'm assuming you meant the section 5.1.
Recursive Self Improvement)
That too, but
BTW, for those who are newbies to this list, Matt's argument attempting to
refute RSI was extensively discussed on this list a few months ago.
In my view, I refuted his argument pretty clearly, although he does not
agree.
His mathematics is correct, but seemed to me irrelevant to real-life RSI
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- On Wed, 11/19/08, Daniel Yokomizo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Matt Mahoney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seed AI is a myth.
http://www.mattmahoney.net/agi2.html (section 2).
(I'm assuming
Back to reality for a moment...
I have greatly increased the IQs of some pretty bright people since I
started doing this in 2001 (the details are way off topic here, so contact
me off-line for more if you are interested), and now, others are also doing
this. I think that these people give us a
--- On Wed, 11/19/08, Daniel Yokomizo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just want to be clear, you agree that an agent is able to create a
better version of itself, not just in terms of a badly defined measure
as IQ but also as a measure of resource utilization.
Yes, even bacteria can do this.
Do