On 4/29/07, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
4947 | default timing | Zefram| 1* | 23Apr07 | D
4948 | rule restoration| Zefram| 3 | 26Apr07 | D
4949 | VC and VLOP decay | Zefram| 3 | 26Apr07 | D
4950 | initialise VLOP properly
Roger Hicks wrote:
I hereby request permission to register under the name BobTHJ.
I hereby call for judgement on the following statement:
BobTHJ registered on or about Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:06:41 -0600.
Arguments:
Rule 869 states "A person registers or deregisters by announcement",
and
Eris wrote:
I call for judgement on the following statement:
"Murphy's message with datestamp Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:59:19 -0700 had
the effect of submitting a proposal."
Arguments:
Rule 106 states, in part, "A player submits a proposal by publishing
it with a clear indication that it is intende
On 4/30/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hereby appeal Goethe's judgement in CFJ 1643, on the grounds of mistaken
reasoning as argued in the previous paragraph.
I concur. I also appeal Goethe's judgement of CFJ 1643.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"You can't prove anything."
-- Gödel's
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> CFJ 1642:
>> where a proposal contains the form of words "Amend rule by XXX.
>> Further amend rule by YYY.", where both XXX and YYY specify
>> text changes, this constitutes a single attempt at a rule change,
>> even though it is specified in two parts in sep
I vote:
4947: FOR
4948: FOR
4949: FOR
4950: FOR
4951: FOR
4952: AGAINST * 8
4953: FOR
4954: FOR
4955: FOR
4956: FOR * 8
4957: AGAINST * 8
-zefram
The Pineapple Partnership hereby votes:
4947: FOR
4948: FOR
4949: FOR
4950: FOR
4951: FOR
4952: AGAINST * 8
4953: FOR
4954: FOR
4955: FOR
(no vote on 4956)
4957: AGAINST * 8
-zefram
Michael Slone wrote:
>I intend, with Agoran Consent, to make Murphy the holder of the office
>of Clerk of the Courts.
The Pineapple Partnership hereby objects.
-zefram
Maud wrote:
> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to make Murphy the holder of the office
> of Clerk of the Courts.
I object to the above.
It seems that there are two, solid blocs of power with conflict-of-interest
in the set of CFJs that's been generated.
I can't make an agreement with myself, bu
PF:
Michael Slone wrote:
>I intend, with Agoran Consent, to make Murphy the holder of the office
>of Clerk of the Courts.
I object. I think Goethe is doing a fine job as CotC. E is assigning
CFJs briskly, keeping the game flowing. I was unhappy about eir three
trivial CFJs, but it is the c
I hereby request permission to register under the name BobTHJ.
Thanks,
BobTHJ
PF
-- Forwarded message --
From: Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Apr 30, 2007 12:34 PM
Subject: Votes and CFJ
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4947 - FOR
4948 - FOR
4949 - FOR
4950 - FOR
4951 - FOR
4952 - 9xAGAINST
4953 - FOR
4954 - AGAINST (I still don't like so much subjectivity in a
PF
-- Forwarded message --
From: Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Apr 30, 2007 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 1638-1645 assigned to Goethe
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/29/07, Michael Slone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to make Murph
4947 AGAINST
4948 AGAINST
4949 FOR
4950 FOR
4951 AGAINST
4952 AGAINSTx7 (we don't need two copies of this rule)
4953 AGAINST
4954 AGAINST (I don't care for rules with non-integer Power - have we
ever had any? also, "at least than" needs a grammar fix)
4955 AGAINST (more non-integer Power; a
14 matches
Mail list logo
