BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5532-5537

> 5532 O1 1.7 comex AGAINSTx4. UNDETERMINED is sufficient for this. > 5533 D1 3Wooble No private law FOR > 5534 D0 2rootFix imposed office resignations FOR > 5535 D1 3Murphy These things are not just for players FOR > 5536 D1 3Murphy Refactor

BUS: FW: distribution of proposals 5532-5537

TTttPF I vote on Agoran Decisions about whether to adopt proposals as follows (each decision is identified by the number of the proposal it is about): 5532 AGAINST*4 5533 FOR 5534 FOR 5535 FOR 5536 FOR 5537 FOR -- ais523

Re: BUS: RE: Rules as Binding Agreement

On Friday 30 May 2008 4:38:33 Alexander Smith wrote: > I retract all my current votes on the Agoran decision about whether > to adopt proposal 5531. > > I vote AGAINST that decision. (I still like the idea, but the > proposal is apparently buggy; nice analysis, Zefram!) > -- > ais523 > > Hmm,

BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1934 assigned to Pavitra

> == CFJ 1934 == > > Hello! > > As this "statement" is not regarding the possibility or legality of a rule-defined action, it could not become a tortoise even if

BUS: RE: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 1934 assigned to Pavitra

Pavitra wrote: > I therefore judge CFJ 1934 IRRELEVANT. I call for judgement on the following statement: "There is a CFJ with ID number 1934". Arguments: "Hello!" is not a statement, thus the attempt to file the CFJ in the first place failed because the information required under rule 591 was no

BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5532-5537

I hereby vote: >5532 O1 1.7 comex AGAINST*10 >5533 D1 3Wooble No private law FOR >5534 D0 2rootFix imposed office resignations FOR >5535 D1 3Murphy These things are not just for players FOR >5536 D1 3Murphy Refactor Regulation FOR >5537

BUS: (no subject)

I submit this proposal, whose title is "" and AI is 3: Amend Rule 106 (Adopting Proposals) by adding this paragraph after the first one: Proposals can include a title, which is a string of characters. When submitting a proposal, the proposer CAN and SHALL set its title. Amend Ru

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Why can't non-players be contestmasters?

On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I intend without three objections to add the AAA to the members list > of the Points Relay Service. > > I intend without three objections to amend the Points Relay Service > contract by renumbering the second section numbere

BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5532-5537

5532 AGAINST x 15 5533 AGAINST 5534 FOR 5535 FOR 5536 FOR 5537 FOR