On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2206
== CFJ 2206 ==
I transferred at least 2 Chits to the PerlNomic Partnership
today
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 20:15 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
== CFJ 2213 ==
The Patent Title Scamster has been revoked from come.
Caller's Arguments:
So far the
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 08:57 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 8:48 AM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you care to elaborate on that? I get TRUE when applying the logic
of CFJ 2203.
In CFJ 2203 I ruled that root cast 3 separate conditional votes. In
this case,
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:47 AM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You said that you thought that the Monster CAN change the rules, but
it's not true that it MAY so I can't change them. Surely that would
imply may=CAN in rule 2141?
Err, yeah. I was only reading R105's granting of the ability to
I retract any votes I may have cast on these proposals and vote:
5753 D 1 3.1 ais523 This one probably ought to fail...
AGAINST
5754 D 1 2.0 comex The Endless Repeals: 1023.a.6-8
FOR
5755 D 1 2.0 comex The Endless Repeals: 2154.5-6
AGAINST
5756 O 1
[[Let the Monster and the Beast live their lives together in peace; the
torches and pickforks are really hotting up over in Agora (you don't
want to see a burning pitchfork, trust me), and so it seems best for the
Monster to flee to a Nomic more likely to respect it.]]
I submit a proposal, with
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, comex wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the caller suggests, it is clear from R2193 and the first paragraph
of R2192 that the Monster fits the intensional
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 07:35, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AAA (BobTHJ)
August - 14 points
September - 16 points
Enigma (ais523)
August - 11 points
September - 11 points
Fantasy Rules Contest (root)
August - 7 points
September - 8 points
Werewolves (Murphy)
August - 9
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also support this.
With the support to root and Goethe, I appeal the judgment in CFJ 2213.
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 11:34 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
THE SHORT LOGICAL RULESET
CoE: This is missing the Scams to fix Scams[ters] rule I scammed into
the ruleset earlier this week.
--
ais523
Proposal: One-way appeals
[Shouldn't apply to appeals, due to time limits for initiating them.]
Amend Rule 2175 (Judicial Retraction and Excess) by replacing this text:
If a judicial case has not had any judge assigned to it, then:
with this text:
If a judicial case (other than
I transfer two 6 crops, a 1 crop, a 3 crop, a 5 crop, and an X crop
to ais523
--
ehird
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 15:42 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Amend Rule 911 by replacing the definitions of REMAND and REASSIGN with
I deposit an X crop with the RBoA. I withdraw a 1 crop from the RBoA. I
harvest 911, the ID number of a recently amended power-1.7 rule, for 5
random Crops.
Change Rule
I submit the following proposal, Protecting Rights, AI-3:
-
[Bug: The R101 preamble allows a right to be defined by a low-powered
rule (The scammers have a right to change the rules), and that low-
powered right would use
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also support this.
With the support
I submit the following proposal titled Secure points:
Upmutate Rule 2136 to power 2.
Upmutate Rule 2179 to power 2, and amend it by appending to the first
paragraph the text:
Changes to point holdings are secured.
-root
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:37 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Goethe wrote:
Did we ever learn who the werewolves were? I was kinda following along
and and some guesses. -G.
No, I think we're still waiting for a fresh
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Goethe wrote:
CFJ 2151:
A moment ago, I revealed that my age is a composite number by
announcement.
TRUE
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement. I ask that the
caller reveal whether e was lying about
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:48 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incidentally, the CFJ on the
scam and the Rule enacted by it have the same ID number.
I mill 6 - 4 to gain a 2 crop.
I mill 9 + 4 to gain a 2 crop.
I mill 4 + 6 to gain an X crop.
I harvest 2213 twice, as a CFJ and a new Rule ID,
On 9 Oct 2008, at 20:10, ehird wrote:
I initialize the Pause.
--
ehird
Oops, need to do that to do that to a public forum, of course.
I initialize the Pause.
--
ehird
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:34 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but them being officially undefined, it would be nice to get rid of
them officially.
I submit the following Proposal:
Express the Sense of Agora that the Registrar SHOULD stop
tracking Watchers for whom working
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:26 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here and Gone Again: a Registrar's Report
I pledge that as far as I can see, this report does not contain any scams.
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:37 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:34 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but them being officially undefined, it would be nice to get rid of
them officially.
I submit the following Proposal:
Express the Sense of Agora that the
I submit the following Proposal (Refresh): {
All Players get 100 Points.
}
On 9 Oct 2008, at 20:43, comex wrote:
I submit the following Proposal (Refresh): {
All Players get 100 Points.
}
Genius! (Once the B players turn up, we'd better forward this to the
list
again, so they see it.)
--
ehird
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:41 PM, ehird [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I think it might be!
(Btw, all B-emergency related discussion should be to a-b, since it is the
emergency forum.)
Some notes on B Nomic Emergency:
(Hi Agora!)
1. I hope you Agorans have some sort of mechanism in place
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, ehird wrote:
4. THIS IS FUN!
Yes.
Billy Pilgrim
No.
This is truly obnoxious, enough for someone like me to turn off delivery
and Just Go Away.
I suggest if we (on the Agoran side) don't move to stop this Spam (for
this is what it is) that it will chase some players
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:26 PM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here and Gone Again: a Registrar's Report
Date of this Report: Thu 9 Oct 2008
Date of last Report: Fri 3 Oct 2008
Date last ratified : Fri 4 Jul 2008
Ratified Report: Sun 29 Jun 2008
Without objection, I intend to
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suggest if we (on the Agoran side) don't move to stop this Spam (for
this is what it is) that it will chase some players away.
I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal case against ehird
for breaching Rule 101 by not
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:18 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suggest if we (on the Agoran side) don't move to stop this Spam (for
this is what it is) that it will chase some players away.
I intend, with 2 support, to
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, comex wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suggest if we (on the Agoran side) don't move to stop this Spam (for
this is what it is) that it will chase some players away.
I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal case against
This message serves to make votes on behalf of the PerlNomic
Partnership (a public contract).
The PerlNomic Partnership votes as follows. Each vote is made a
number of times equal to the maximum number of valid votes that
the PerlNomic Partnership can make on an ordinary decision on each
At a time when players of B are shifting in,
I feel an impetus on me - perhaps imagined -
to shift out. One way to find out.
With 1.0 Agoran Consent, I intend to deregister.
5746 O 1 1.0 Murphy The Notary web site is there to be
FOR
5747 O 1 1.0 Bayes Ordinary for a of
FOR
5748 D 1 3.0 ehird Let's Get Our Names Right, Shall
endorse Taral
5749 O 1 1.0 Bayes Spelling abuse capatilization vlop
FOR
5750 O 1 1.0
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At a time when players of B are shifting in,
I feel an impetus on me - perhaps imagined -
to shift out. One way to find out.
With 1.0 Agoran Consent, I intend to deregister.
AGAINST
(D'oh.)
5765 O 1 1.0 Wooble none
AGAINST
5766 O 0 1.0 ais523 root made me do it
SELL(1VP - FOR)
5767 D 1 2.0 Murphy Be careful what you start
FOR
5768 O 1 1.0 Murphy One-way appeals
FOR
5769 D 1 3.0 Goethe Protecting Rights
FOR
On Thursday 09 October 2008 09:07:10 pm Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I is a copikat.
I withdraw a 0 crop from the RBoA. I harvest 101, the number of a
recently amended rule, for 9 random crops.
Yeah, me too.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:09, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 15:42 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Amend Rule 911 by replacing the definitions of REMAND and REASSIGN with
I deposit an X crop with the RBoA. I withdraw a 1 crop from the RBoA. I
harvest 911, the ID number of a
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 20:37, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:09, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 15:42 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Amend Rule 911 by replacing the definitions of REMAND and REASSIGN with
I deposit an X crop with the RBoA. I
On Thursday 09 October 2008 10:53:28 pm Charles Reiss wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 20:37, Roger Hicks wrote:
I create the following crops in the possession of ais523:
8, 3, 5, 3, 0, 1, 4, 6, 5, 9, 3
I initiate an equity case.
As a party to the contract in question, I submit the
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With 1.0 Agoran Consent, I intend to deregister.
AGAINST. You cannot escape!
--
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you.
-- Unknown
41 matches
Mail list logo
