I resign Registrar.
I resign Notary.
Sorry, I'll probably take them back up in a while if nobody
else seems to want them, but Agora mail's coming faster than
I can process it at the moment and I can't keep the reports
up to date. Given that I can't produce an up-to-date report
for either office
I PBA-deposit an 8 crop.
I PBA-withdraw a 1 crop.
I harvest 107, an amended power-3 rule, for 8 crops.
I harvest 955, an amended power-3 rule, for 8 crops.
I harvest 1728, an amended power-3 rule, for 8 crops. [using an X as a
1 crop if my withdrawal above failed]
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I become a party to the following:
{
1. This is a pledge and a public contract under the rules of Agora.
The name of this pledge is Redistribution Bribe.
2. ais523, Goethe, Murphy, OscarMeyr, and Taral can join this
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend, without objection, to ratify the most recently published Short
Logical Ruleset.
I object, because I don't trust you and comex, especially with a vague
referent including most recently published.
(Ok, I also don't
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Warrigal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I join the Dollarous Exchange.
I intend to make USD Vouchers an Eligible Currency with the support of
The People.
I object.
On Nov 13, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to choose the
holders of the IADoP and Tailor offices. The eligible voters are the
active players and the vote collector is the IADoP.
For IADoP, the valid options are Wooble and Warrigal.
On Nov 16, 2008, at 7:38 AM, Alexander Smith wrote:
I resign Registrar.
I resign Notary.
That being the case, I nominate comex and ehird for Notary. I
nominate the AFO and the PNP for Registrar.
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
On Nov 14, 2008, at 12:28 PM, comex wrote:
(I have a nasty habit of forgetting to deal with voting results...)
Proposal 5833 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by Murphy, Taral
No involuntary recordkeepors
Amend Rule 2166 (Assets) by replacing instrument with rule,
This succeeds, but now the
On Nov 15, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Taral wrote:
I harvest 107, an amended power-3 rule, for 8 crops.
I harvest 955, an amended power-3 rule, for 8 crops.
I harvest 107, an amended power-3 rule, for 8 crops.
I harvest 955, an amended power-3 rule, for 8 crops.
I harvest 1728, an amended power-3
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:04:08 -0800
The PerlNomic Partnership [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This distribution of proposals 5965-5971 initiates the Agoran
Decisions on whether to adopt them. The eligible voters for ordinary
proposals are the active players, the eligible voters for democratic
5965 D 1 3.0 Pavitra Precedent
AGAINST
5966 O 1 1.0 Wooble Enough
FOR * 5
5967 O 1 1.0 Murphy Fix Left in a Huff again
FOR * 5
5968 O 1 1.0 Murphy Embassies
FOR * 5
5969 D 1 2.0 comex Veracify interest
AGAINST
5970 D 1
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend, without objection, to deregister cctoide and Doopy, both of
whom have been inactive for at least three months.
Having received no objections, I deregister cctoide and Doopy.
--Wooble
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Pavitra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For Tailor, the valid options are Wooble and Warrigal.
SELL(1VP - WARRIGAL)
I fill this ticket.
I fill Murphy's open ticket to endorse the filler in the Tailor election.
--Wooble
I intend, with 2 support, to make the Agoran Decision on whether to
adopt proposal 5966 Democratic.
I accept all nominations I have been given.
I vote as follows:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:04, The PerlNomic Partnership
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
5965 D 1 3.0 Pavitra Precedent
AGAINST
5966 O 1 1.0 Wooble Enough
AGAINST
5967 O 1 1.0 Murphy Fix Left in a Huff
On behalf of P1: P1 registers.
On behalf of P2: P2 registers.
On behalf of P3: P3 registers.
On behalf of P4: P4 registers.
On behalf of P5: P5 registers.
On behalf of P6: P6 registers.
On behalf of P7: P7 registers.
On behalf of P8: P8 registers.
On behalf of P9: P9 registers.
On behalf of P10:
I CFJ on the statement:
{
ehird is a Walrus.
}
On behalf of P1: P1 spends one F# note to increase ehird's voting
limit on Proposal 5962 by 1.
On behalf of P2: P2 spends one F# note to increase ehird's voting
limit on Proposal 5962 by 1.
On behalf of P3: P3 spends one F# note to increase ehird's
Oops.
I cause Rule 2218 to amend itself by appending the text:
ehird CAN act on behalf of Rule 2218 to enact a new Rule by
announcement which includes the title, text, and power of the
new rule.
I act on behalf of Rule 2218 to create a new Power=1 Rule, titled The
New Threat
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 15:58, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
On behalf of P100: P100 registers.
I intend with 2 support to initiate a criminal case against comex for
violating rule 1742 by violating the P100 contract by causing P100 to
register with the same basis as another player.
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:23:54 -0800
Charles Reiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 15:58, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
On behalf of P100: P100 registers.
I intend with 2 support to initiate a criminal case against comex for
violating rule 1742 by violating the P100
comex wrote:
5956 5962
ehird 51F 51F
Claim of error: P1 through P100 didn't have the Notes that they
allegedly spent to increase ehird's voting limit, so most of these
were ineffective, so these proposals were not adopted.
woggle wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 15:58, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
On behalf of P100: P100 registers.
I intend with 2 support to initiate a criminal case against comex for
violating rule 1742 by violating the P100 contract by causing P100 to
register with the same basis as
For each of the 100 partnerships P1 through P100, I intend (with
Agoran consent) to deregister that partnership per Rule 2144.
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:33:56 -0800
Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For each of the 100 partnerships P1 through P100, I intend (with
Agoran consent) to deregister that partnership per Rule 2144.
Nuts to that. By this announcement, I deregister the 100 partnerships P1
through P100 per rule
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 16:30, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
woggle wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 15:58, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
On behalf of P100: P100 registers.
I intend with 2 support to initiate a criminal case against comex for
violating rule 1742 by violating the
(I realize this leaves dangling references to contracts in some rules, but that
can be cleaned up later.)
I submit the following proposal:
Shoot Them All and Sort it Out Later (AI=2)
All contracts are destroyed.
The following rules are repealed:
Rule 1742 (Contracts)
Rule 2197 (Defining
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:58:21 -0500
comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On behalf of P1: P1 registers.
...
On behalf of P100: P100 registers.
I initiate an inquiry case on the following statement, disqualifying comex:
None of the attempted registrations (P1 through P100) in comex's quoted message
I flip my posture to sitting.
--
Elysion
2008/11/17 Joshua Boehme [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The question is, does the so in the second sentence refer to
deregister[ing] or to deregister[ing] by announcement? If the latter,
then even deregistrations by means of a Cantus Cygneus trigger a thirty day
window.
--
Elysion
Arguments:
Proposal: My logic is undeniable
(AI = 1.5, II = 0, please)
Upon the adoption of this proposal, comex is awarded the Patent Title
of Scamster, unless e already bears it.
Upon the adoption of this proposal, ehird is awarded the Patent Title
of Scamster, unless e already bears it.
CoE:
This is missing most of the votes that were cast on this proposal.
I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal case alleging that
the AFO violated Rule 2215 by publishing the below message in an
attempt to mislead other into thinking P5961 passed.
I intend, with 2 support, to initiate
Proposal: Clarify quorum alterations
(AI = 2, please)
Amend Rule 2177 (The Senate) by replacing this text:
A proposal that ends its voting period in filibuster has a
quorum of the number of eligible voters plus 1, rules to the
contrary notwithstanding.
with this text:
I submit the following proposal.
Proposal: Reign in the Aristocracy (AI=2)
Amend rule 2156 (Voting on Ordinary Decisions) by replacing the text reading:
Alpha - 8
Beta- 5
with:
Alpha - 5
Beta- 4
If a rule entitled Maximum Voting Limits exists,
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 16, 2008, at 7:38 AM, Alexander Smith wrote:
I resign Registrar.
I resign Notary.
That being the case, I nominate comex and ehird for Notary. I nominate the
AFO and the PNP for Registrar.
I nominate myself
I wrote:
Pavitra wrote:
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 01:03:30 am Ed Murphy wrote:
i) (in Agora) floor(P/N) points to each winner of the
session, where P is the maximum number of points that a contest CAN
award per week, and N is the number of winners of the session.
This is probably
I wrote:
I intend, without member objection, to amend the Werewolves contract by
removing sections 6b and 7e (neither of which make sense with public
voting), and renumbering 6c to 6b.
I intend, without member objection, to amend the Werewolves contract by
replacing section 1g with this
I wrote:
I intend (without member objection) to amend the Werewolves contract by
appending this text to section 3:
A vote submitted conditionally is evaluated continuously, and
counts as null unless its value can be reasonably determined,
without circularity or paradox, from
38 matches
Mail list logo
