Aaand... this.
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:
I opine AFFIRM without prejudice. The original judgement suggests a
precedent that even a disclaimered statement violates Truthiness if you
don't reasonably believe it could be true.
Also,
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
On 08/14/2010 08:57 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
I hereby initiate the Agoran decision, for which the Herald is vote
collector, to decide on the degree, if any, to be awarded to ais523 for
eir thesis, A History of Agoran Wins, 2009-Present.
The
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010, comex wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
This, this.
G., if you're going to AFFIRM as well, can you please specify a
substantive set of arguments? In particular, it would help if you
made some reference to my arguments for
Oops, a three-way split among the panel no longer defaults to REMAND
(unless the time limit runs out and it's tie-broken that way by other
means).
I revise my opinion to REMAND without prejudice, recommending that the
original judge explicitly address how the form
series of actions (disclaimer:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:
Oops, a three-way split among the panel no longer defaults to REMAND
(unless the time limit runs out and it's tie-broken that way by other
means).
I revise my opinion to REMAND without prejudice, recommending that the
original judge explicitly
On 13 August 2010 21:11, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/13/2010 01:07 PM, ais523 wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 13:09 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
RIBBONS WORN
Player ROGCBKWMUVIPYS Ribbon count (14 to win)
On 15 August 2010 04:57, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
I hereby initiate the Agoran decision, for which the Herald is vote
collector, to decide on the degree, if any, to be awarded to ais523 for eir
thesis, A History of Agoran Wins, 2009-Present.
The available options are FAILING GRADE,
On 08/15/2010 10:46 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 13:31, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/15/2010 11:20 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
I withdraw this proposal.
Proposal: Super Robot Powers (AI=1, II=1, coauthor)
{{{
Enact a new Rule reading
The Robot can, by announcement,
On 08/12/2010 12:58 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
I intend, without objection, to clean Rule 2299 by replacing is
rewarded a farad (which makes no sense) with earns a farad.
-coppro
Having received no objections, I do so.
-coppro
I pay fees to make every Undistributable proposal in the Proposal Pool
distributable, then I withdraw The Robot and submit and identical
proposal and pay a fee to make it Distributable (so that it gets
distributed in the same batch as Super Robot Powers).
-coppro
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
This distribution of proposals 6790-6810
initiates the Agoran Decisions on whether to adopt them. The eligible
voters are the active players at the time of this distribution, and
the vote collector is the Assessor. The valid options on each decision
are FOR and AGAINST
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
6790 R 1 2.0 Wooble Assumption Makes This Unnecessary
FOR
6791 P 1 1.0 omd Contestification
6792 P 1 2.0 omd Contests
Assessor:
On 08/16/2010 08:17 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Proposal 6805 (Green, AI=1.0, Interest=1) by Keba (co-author, Warrigal)
ENDORSE the Captain.
-coppro
On 08/16/2010 06:08 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
This distribution of proposals 6790-6810
initiates the Agoran Decisions on whether to adopt them. The eligible
voters are the active players at the time of this distribution, and
the vote collector is the Assessor. The valid options on each decision
G. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:
Oops, a three-way split among the panel no longer defaults to REMAND
(unless the time limit runs out and it's tie-broken that way by other
means).
I revise my opinion to REMAND without prejudice, recommending that the
original judge
ais523 wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 11:39 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
G.
Amend R107 by replacing:
Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the
voting period for a decision with at least two options cannot be
shorter than seven days.
with:
The voting
16 matches
Mail list logo
