BUS: Sorta Back

2010-09-16 Thread Aaron Goldfein
I come off hold. I lean.

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6834-6841 (Corrected)

2010-09-16 Thread omd
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > I assume the office of Promotor. > > > This distribution of proposals 6834-6841 > initiates the Agoran Decisions on whether to adopt them.  The eligible > voters are the active players at the time of this distribution, and > the vote collecto

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6842-6846

2010-09-16 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble, G., your votes may have been ineffective due to the succession weirdness. Tiger, Tanner, yours are okay because they occurred after democratization. >2.0 1 omd 2010-09-07 6842 Capa FOR >1.0 1 Keba 2010-09-07 6843 White Renaissance FOR >2.0 1 Keba

BUS: Proposal: Non-linear voting limits

2010-09-16 Thread Ed Murphy
Proposal: Non-linear voting limits (AI = 2, II = 1, distributable via fee) Amend Rule 2279 (Voting Limits on Ordinary Decisions) by replacing this text: (1) Take the Influence Level associated with the player's position on the list of succession, or 5 if the player

Re: BUS: Proposals 6834-41 are probably failing quorum due to succession weirdness

2010-09-16 Thread ais523
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 20:55 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > I believe that ais523, Wooble, and G.'s votes were ineffective, and > thus the voting periods were doubled due to lack of quorum. I urge > em to re-cast eir votes, and unconditionally wag my finger at those > who didn't even attempt to vote. >

BUS: Proposals 6834-41 are probably failing quorum due to succession weirdness

2010-09-16 Thread Ed Murphy
History of Proposals 6834-41: Tue 7 Sep 13:07:14 Ineffective distribution Tue 7 Sep 13:37:25 Keba attempts to vote Tue 7 Sep 15:27:28 omd (I think) attempts to vote Tue 7 Sep 18:13:52 Taral attempts to vote Tue 7 Sep 19:56:08 Effective distribution; Tiger is Crown Prince Fri 10 Sep 09:14

BUS: (no subject)

2010-09-16 Thread comex
Proposal: individualism (AI=2, II=0, Distributable) Repeal Rule 2303 (Teams), Rule 2304 (The Referee), Rule 2305 (Fans), and Rule 2306 (Team Tactics).

Re: BUS: Do we need monkeys?

2010-09-16 Thread Keba
Geoffrey Spear wrote: > I submit the following Fragment: > {{ > οἵ πίθηκοι ἀλλο-πρόσαλλοι ἔστοι > }} This is fragment #23. -- Assumed Granulator Keba

Re: BUS: Do we need monkeys?

2010-09-16 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Keba wrote: > > Keba wrote: > >> I, the Granulator, intend without three objections to cause all > >> fragments to cause to be fragments. > > > > I intend without three objections to cause all fragments to cease to b

Re: BUS: Do we need monkeys?

2010-09-16 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Keba wrote: > Keba wrote: >> I, the Granulator, intend without three objections to cause all >> fragments to cause to be fragments. > > I intend without three objections to cause all fragments to cease to be > fragments. I object to all pending intents to destroy