On 01/10/2012 10:25 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I initiate an election for Ambassador, nominating ais523, omd, and
> Pavitra. (All are non-idle players of BlogNomic; I believe the only
> others are scshunt [who recently resigned] and me [I don't want it].)
I decline.
CFJ: {{Rule 2351 indirectly allows players to make arbitrary modifications to
the game state.}}
Evidence: Rule 2339 allows players to cause Agora Nomic to perform an action
with Agoran Consent or without objection. Rule 2351 allows Agora to make
arbitrary changes to the game state. Therefore,
I lean.
>> 7144 1.7 Murphy Extraterritorial jurisdiction
> AGAINST
>> 7145 2 omd A controversial proposal
> AGAINST
>> 7146 2 omd Risk
> FOR
>> 7147 1.7 Murphy Okay, that worked once
> FOR
>> 7148 1.7 Murphy Okay, that worked
I initiate an election for Ambassador, nominating ais523, omd, and
Pavitra. (All are non-idle players of BlogNomic; I believe the only
others are scshunt [who recently resigned] and me [I don't want it].)
I initiate an election for Promotor. Per Rule 2154, omd is considered
to have been nominat
7144 1.7 Murphy Extraterritorial jurisdiction
FOR
7145 2 omd A controversial proposal
AGAINST (I think you meant "unambiguous" there at the end?)
7146 2 omd Risk
FOR
7147 1.7 Murphy Okay, that worked once
FOR
7148 1.7 Murphy
I assume Promotor.
No, ehird, an out-of-context "I object" is not sufficient to trigger
deregistration via exercise of R101(vii) right. In particular, see
CFJs 2323 and 2380.
David unambiguously registered on January 1 and has no other reason
to have been deregistered afterward. TRUE.
