BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3176 judged UNDETERMINED by omd

2012-03-11 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:21, Ed Murphy wrote: > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3176 > > ==  CFJ 3176  == > >    The Registrar's Report includes within its list of all players a >    list of all Golems. > > =

BUS: hmm

2012-03-11 Thread Sean Hunt
Proposal: Truisms (AI=3) {{{ Enact a new 3-power rule entitled "The Cold Hard Truth" reading "Every rule has an exception." }}} -scshunt

BUS: Registration

2012-03-11 Thread Elliott Hird
I register. -- bayes 2012-03-21 02:22:50 +

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7187-7190

2012-03-11 Thread omd
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:38 PM, omd wrote: > 7190 AGAINST I retract this and vote FOR.

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of Proposals 7187-7190

2012-03-11 Thread FKA441344
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: > omd wrote: > >> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran >> Decision of whether to adopt it.  For this decision, the eligible >> voters are the active first-class players at the time of this >> distribution, the vote collect

BUS: Judgement of 3173, intent to appeal 3172, support for intent to appeal 3151, and support for intents to make cases notable

2012-03-11 Thread FKA441344
If I have not yet judged case 3173, I judge it as follows: Per cases 3170 and 3154, I judge this case FALSE. If I judged case 3172 FALSE, I intend to appeal it with two support, on the grounds that the judgement I assigned to it was intended for case 3173. On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Ed Murp

BUS: (no subject)

2012-03-11 Thread FKA441344
I assume Registrar.

BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3182 assigned to G.

2012-03-11 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012, Ed Murphy wrote: > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3182 > == CFJ 3182 == > > omd is a player. > > However Mr. In

BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 3184-86 assigned to omd

2012-03-11 Thread omd
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Rule 1504 requires specifying "a " in order to initiate, and > the rest of it generally appears to assume that this means "exactly one > ". This is about a criminal case in which I am the defendant, so I would recuse myself, but I think this is