On 29 June 2012 23:36, omd wrote:
> 7251 1 Tanner L. Swett Reduction
AGAINST
> 7252 3 441344 DEFENSE FIX
AGAINST
> 7253 3 441344 DEFENSE FIX Mk II
AGAINST
> 7254 3 441344, etc. DEFENSE FIX Mk III
FOR
> 7255 2 441344 ANTI-SIEGE Mk II
PRESENT
> 7256 1 4
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:36 PM, omd wrote:
> 7251 1 Tanner L. Swett Reduction
FOR
> 7252 3 441344 DEFENSE FIX
AGAINST
> 7253 3 441344 DEFENSE FIX Mk II
FOR
> 7254 3 441344, etc. DEFENSE FIX Mk III
AGAINST
> 7255 2 441344 ANTI-SIEGE Mk II
AGAINST
> 7256
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:47 PM, omd wrote:
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>
> Proposal 7260 (AI=2, Ordinary) by Murphy, Bucky
> Golem radar
PRESENT
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>
> Proposal 7256 (AI=1, Ordinar
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:36 PM, omd wrote:
> 7251 1 Tanner L. Swett Reduction
PRESENT
> 7252 3 441344 DEFENSE FIX
AGAINST
> 7253 3 441344 DEFENSE FIX Mk II
AGAINST
> 7254 3 441344, etc. DEFENSE FIX Mk III
AGAINST
> 7255 2 441344 ANTI-SIEGE Mk II
AGAINS
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:42 PM, omd wrote:
> I re-distribute this proposal;
Oops, I can't do that because I already resigned. I assume Promotor.
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, the eligible
voters are the activ
Correction: The first bit is the list of co-authors, not part of the
text, which starts at "Create a rule". I re-distribute this proposal;
for this decision, the eligible voters are the active first-class
players at the time of this distribution, the vote collector is the
Assessor, and the valid o
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:12 PM, omd wrote:
> Proposal: Apathia (AI=3)
>
> [I've been playing a little BlogNomic recently; meanwhile, even with
> enhanced (but old-fashioned) veto and rubberstamp powers, nobody wants
> to be Speaker...]
>
> Repeal Rule 2366 (Veto and Rubberstamp).
>
> Amend Rule
Proposal: Fix (AI=3)
[Re-apply the effects of 6806.]
Increase Rule 1551 (Ratification)'s power to 3.1.
[Re-apply the effects of 6607.]
Amend Rule 1769 by replacing
b) the future event would occur during a Holiday, then the
future event occurs 72 hours after the end of that Holiday
