On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 23:45 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> CFJ, barring Murphy, (requesting link to previous CFJs of the last
> few minutes of G. and ais523):
>In the last few minutes, G. transferred exactly one ruble to ais523.
>
> Callers' Arguments for recent CFJs by G. and ais523 (same arg
CFJ, barring Murphy, (requesting link to previous CFJs of the last
few minutes of G. and ais523):
In the last few minutes, G. transferred exactly one ruble to ais523.
Callers' Arguments for recent CFJs by G. and ais523 (same arguments
for all three CFJs)
First, apologies for barring H. Judge
On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 07:37 +0100, ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 23:32 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I create the following promise:
> > Name: Ping
> > Text: I transfer one ruble to ais523 and cash the promise entitled
> > 'Pong'.
> > Conditions: This promise is not destroye
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 23:32 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I create the following promise:
> Name: Ping
> Text: I transfer one ruble to ais523 and cash the promise entitled
> 'Pong'.
> Conditions: This promise is not destroyed on cashing.
>
> I transfer this promise (Ping) to ais523.
I create the following promise:
Name: Ping
Text: I transfer one ruble to ais523 and cash the promise entitled 'Pong'.
Conditions: This promise is not destroyed on cashing.
I transfer this promise (Ping) to ais523.
I create the following promise, "a CFJ", with this text:
I CFJ
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, John Smith wrote:
> >
> > CfJ, Inquiry, barring scshunt: "CfJ 3212 is a turtle"
(Oops, cut/paste error).
I favor the above CFJ. -G.
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, John Smith wrote:
>
> CfJ, Inquiry, barring scshunt: "CfJ 3212 is a turtle"
CfJ, Inquiry, barring scshunt: "CfJ 3212 is a turtle"
Arguments:
The
hypothetical does not arise from the CfJ itself, but rather from
another (hypothetical) statement that happens to be identical to the
CfJ's statement.
Evidence:
== CFJ 3212
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:39 PM, John Smith wrote:
> Admitted. Trying again.
>
> I, Bucky, satisfy the Victory Condition of Paradox (on CfJ 3212) while also
> not satisfying any Losing Conditions. (This is a Victory Announcement)
CoE: No you do not. The hypothetical is arising out of the case it
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:39 PM, John Smith wrote:
> Machiavelli satisfies the Victory Condition of Paradox (on CfJ 3220) while
> also not satisfying any Losing Conditions. (This is a Victory Announcement)
I claim that the quoted announcement is in error. Grounds: I NEVER
WANTED TO WIN 6Y PARAD9
Admitted. Trying again.
I, Bucky, satisfy the Victory Condition of Paradox (on CfJ 3212) while also not
satisfying any Losing Conditions. (This is a Victory Announcement)
Machiavelli satisfies the Victory Condition of Paradox (on CfJ 3220) while
also not satisfying any Losing Conditions. (Thi
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 17:53 -0700, John Smith wrote:
> The only losing condition is Seeking Asylum, which I do not satisfy.
> CfJ 3220 has been a turtle for one week; therefore, I, Bucky, satisfy
> the Victory Condition of Paradox while also not satisfying any Losing
> Conditions. (This is a Victo
The only losing condition is Seeking Asylum, which I do not satisfy. CfJ 3220
has been a turtle for one week; therefore, I, Bucky, satisfy the Victory
Condition of Paradox while also not satisfying any Losing Conditions. (This is
a Victory Announcement)
I cause BuckyBot to announce "I intend
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3244
>
> == CFJ 3244 ==
>
> It would be ILLEGAL for a player to publish a message whose body
> consisted solely of the text
[I think I'm just outside the voting period unless there's been
apathy. Nonetheless].
I vote:
> 7251 1 Tanner L. Swett Reduction
> 7252 3 441344 DEFENSE FIX
> 7253 3 441344 DEFENSE FIX Mk II
> 7254 3 441344, etc. DEFENSE FIX Mk III
> 7255 2 441344 A
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3229
>
> = Criminal Case 3229 =
>
> scshunt violated Rule 2158 by failing to assign judgement to
> case 3218 ASAP after it was assigned to e
3240: UNDECIDABLE
I accept the caller's arguments. Ozymandias has not won the game, so
neither TRUE nor FALSE is appropriate.
CFJ: It would be ILLEGAL for a player to publish a message whose body
consisted solely of the text "I intend, without objection, to ratify
the statement of CFJ 3240.".
CoE on the recent CotC report, admitted: CFJ 3240 was assigned
(event list was correct, case list was not).
18 matches
Mail list logo
