Proposal: Power On (AI=3)
{{{
Amend the rule Democratization by appending
{{
Changing the voting limit of an entity on a Democratic decision is
secured with power threshold 3.
}}
Amend rule 1950 by replacing
{{
The eligible voters on a decision with an adoption index are
th
Proposal: Slow Down (AI=1)
{{{
Amend the rule 'Props' by replacing
{At the beginning of each week}
with
{At the beginning of each month}
[Resetting every week when a player can make one transfer every week
will leave everyone at 14 props perpetually unless there is a serious
concerted effort]
}}}
-
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 00:47 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to flip the Recognition of Deepnomic to
> Friendly. (They seem friendly enough, are one of the few active nomics
> other than us that is probably capable of having friendly relations with
> anyone due to BlogNomic
Proposal: unrevive lame pun 1 (Plutocratic)
{
Repeal Rule 2376 (Props).
}
Proposal: unrevive lame pun 2 (Aerocratic)
{
Repeal Rule 2376 (Props).
}
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>[...]
> NUM AI AUTHOR TITLE
> 7284 3.0 FKA441344 No Zero Length Reports
FOR
> 7285 2.0 omd.No News Is No News
AGAINST
> 7286 1.0 FKA441344 No News Is Some News
FOR
> 7287 2.0 G. Faucet Fixing
FOR
> 7288 2.0 FKA441344
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>[...]
> NUM AI AUTHOR TITLE
> 7298 2.0 FKA441344 (none)
FOR
> 7299 1.5 FKA441344 (none)
FOR
>[...]
For the purposes of the below, a proposal is "passing" if, if the
proposal's voting period were already over, its outcome would be
ADOPTED.
I vote:
> 7284 3.0 FKA441344 No Zero Length Reports
AGAINST if Proposal 7286 and/or Proposal 7285 is passing, FOR otherwise
> 7285 2.0 omd.No News
For the purposes of the below, endorsing a series of voters means
endorsing the first voter, unless this would result in a vote of
PRESENT, in which case endorsing the second voter, and so on.
"Chopper" means "the CotC, then the Herald, then the Rulekeepor, then
the Ambassador, then the Promotor, t
