7356 1.5 Ordinary G. Aveho Justitiarius!
FOR
7357 3.0 Ordinary G. Controlling Interest
FOR
7358 1.0 Ordinary G. Proxy Victory
FOR
7359 1.0 Ordinary G. Proxy Loss
FOR
7360 3.0 Ordinary G. Proxy Voting
FOR
7361 2.0
On 4/1/2013 9:19 PM, Joe Vasoli wrote:
*From:* Joseph terminus...@hotmail.com mailto:terminus...@hotmail.com
*Date:* April 2, 2013, 12:14:08 AM EDT
*To:* tue75...@temple.edu mailto:tue75...@temple.edu
tue75...@temple.edu mailto:tue75...@temple.edu
*Subject:* *Agora*
ID AI CHAMBER
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Tanner Swett wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Tanner Swett wrote:
If I cash this, my VVLOP will go all the way up to 12 and so
everyone's VVLOP will be reset to 4.
Ah, I missed that we'd all gone
We claim that this document is in error, as it shows Proposal 7354
receiving more Against Votes than For Votes, but still shows it as
having been Adopted. Clearly, one fact or the other is inaccurate.
--Wes
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Voting results
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I create the following promise, GVC5:
Text:
I spend 1 VC to increase Machiavelli's VVLOP by one.
I spend 1 VC to increase Machiavelli's VVLOP by one.
I spend 1 VC to increase Machiavelli's VVLOP by one.
Proposal: Prevent identification of something or other (AI=3)
[Upon review, I guess I misunderstood Judge ais523's arguments in CFJ
3297; however, despite my curmudgeonliness, I still don't think the
fix proposal was adequate. We seem to be interpreting constitutes
self-ratifying claims that X
