On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:11 PM, omd wrote:
> AI-2. Amend Rules 1504 (Criminal Cases) and 2277 (Appeals of Criminal
> Cases) by replacing "Accused" with "defendant".
Meh. I retract this and submit a modified version:
Proposal: Such an ugly word (AI=2, PF=40)
Amend Rules 1504 (Criminal Cases)
AI-2. Amend Rules 1504 (Criminal Cases) and 2277 (Appeals of Criminal
Cases) by replacing "Accused" with "defendant".
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 13:31 -0700, omd wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:11 PM, omd wrote:
> > As Assessor, I note that means Murphy's most recent attempts to
> > resolve 7435-7443 were correct. In particular, 7436 was adopted,
> > scshunt's attempts to award Lime Ribbons for 7436 were valid, an
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:11 PM, omd wrote:
> As Assessor, I note that means Murphy's most recent attempts to
> resolve 7435-7443 were correct. In particular, 7436 was adopted,
> scshunt's attempts to award Lime Ribbons for 7436 were valid, and
> 7437-7443 all failed quorum, except for 7442, whic
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Above, my arguments assert that "self-ratification" of the specific
> Registrar's and IDAoP reports affect state but not history, but
> ratification in general CAN affect history. New evidence shows that such
> ratification without objection
[Re]-judgement of CFJ 3337. H. CotC, please leave my original arguments
as part of my overall judgement, as my re-judgement below relates to it:
BREAKING NEW EVIDENCE!!
Above, my arguments assert that "self-ratification" of the specific
Registrar's and IDAoP reports affect state but not histor
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Jonathan Rouillard
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> I intend (with 2 support) to request reconsideration, suggesting
>> REMAND so we can get some arguments and/or evidence.
>>
>
> I support.
I support and do so.
For clarity in the j
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Proposal: Lateral transfer
>>
>> Amend Rule 2138 (The Interstellar Associate Director of Personnel) by
>> changing "Interstellar" to "Interdimensional" in its text and title.
>>
>
> Proposal:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Proposal: Lateral transfer
>
> Amend Rule 2138 (The Interstellar Associate Director of Personnel) by
> changing "Interstellar" to "Interdimensional" in its text and title.
>
Proposal: Scoping It Out (AI=1, PF=20)
{{{
Amend Rule 2138 by appending
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Ed Murphy wrote:
> scshunt wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > > <<<
> > > scshunt registered on or about Mon Apr 1 18:04:26 UTC 2013, and has been
> > > continuously registered from that time to the time the first intent to
> > > ratify this te
Proposal: Lateral transfer
Amend Rule 2138 (The Interstellar Associate Director of Personnel) by
changing "Interstellar" to "Interdimensional" in its text and title.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I intend (with 2 support) to request reconsideration, suggesting
> REMAND so we can get some arguments and/or evidence.
>
I support.
~ Roujo
Roujo wrote:
Detail: http://cotc.psychose.ca/viewcase.php?cfj=3327
== CFJ 3327 ==
It was POSSIBLE for me to cash 'ZipZop Series G-002' when I
attempted to do so.
===
I award the Standard Case Fee to the following players for their
timely judgements on the corresponding CFJs:
- Walker, for CFJ 3334
- omd, for CFJ 3345
- G., for CFJ 3337
~ Roujo
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013, omd wrote:
> I deputise for the CotC to assign CFJ 3337 to G..
>
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3337
>
> == CFJ 3337 ==
>
> scshunt is an eligible voter on the decision to adopt Prop
15 matches
Mail list logo
