On 05/07/2013 4:17 PM, omd wrote:
CoE: These are one proposal. I redistribute 7504 as follows:
Proposal 7504 (AI=2, PF=Y10, Ordinary) by scshunt
The Agoran Senate
FOR
On 5 Jul 2013, at 22:58, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Proposal, AI - 1.5, Badges Badges Badges Badges
I change my vote in the Herald election to endorse G..
-- Walker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:08 PM, omd wrote:
> [...]
> NUM AI PF C AUTHOR TITLE
>
> 7497 10 O Walker (untitled)
AGAINST
> 7503 2 40 O Walker Yak niggles
FOR
> 7504 2 10 O scshunt The Agoran Senate
> 7505 10 O scshunt
Proposal, AI - 1.5, Badges Badges Badges Badges
Create the following Rule, power-1.5, "Badges":
A Badge is any patent title with the word 'badge' as part of its
name. A badge SHOULD be used to award multiple
I vote:
On Jul 5, 2013, at 4:08 PM, omd wrote:
> 7510 30 G Walker Gerontocracy Fix
AGAINST per ais523: it ought to be possible to restart the Gerontocracy early.
—Machiavelli
NUM AI PF C I AUTHOR TITLE
7482 10 O D Murphy Lateral transfer
FOR
7483 1 20 O scshunt Scoping It Out
FOR
7484 1 20 O Roujo Scoping It All
FOR
7485 2 40 O omd Such an ugly word
FOR
7486 20 O D scshunt Clearing Up
PRESENT
7487 3 10 O scshunt
On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 16:08 -0400, omd wrote:
> NUM AI PF C AUTHOR TITLE
I vote as follows:
> 7497 10 O Walker (untitled)
PRESENT; I'm winning on this but nobody seems to want to play any more
> 7503 2 40 O Walker Yak niggles
FOR
> 7504 2 10 O scshunt The Agoran Senate
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 4:08 PM, omd wrote:
> Distributing early per the request accompanying Gerontocracy Fix.
>
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it.
>
> For the Gerontocratc proposal Gerontocracy Fix, the eligible voters
> are the El
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 4:17 PM, omd wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 4:08 PM, omd wrote:
>> Proposal 7504 (AI=2, PF=Y10, Ordinary) by scshunt
>> Proposal 7505 (AI=1, PF=Y0, Ordinary) by scshunt
>
> CoE: These are one proposal. I redistribute 7504 as follows:
>
> Proposal 7504 (AI=2, PF=Y10, Ordin
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 4:08 PM, omd wrote:
> 7497 10 O Walker (untitled)
FOR
> 7503 2 40 O Walker Yak niggles
FOR
> 7504 2 10 O scshunt The Agoran Senate
AGAINST
> 7506 1 30 O Walker ais523's Rule
AGAINST (as has been revealed, infinite Yaks are possible)
> 7507 20
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 4:08 PM, omd wrote:
> Proposal 7504 (AI=2, PF=Y10, Ordinary) by scshunt
> Proposal 7505 (AI=1, PF=Y0, Ordinary) by scshunt
CoE: These are one proposal. I redistribute 7504 as follows:
Proposal 7504 (AI=2, PF=Y10, Ordinary) by scshunt
The Agoran Senate
Enact a new rule en
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:42 AM, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:18 AM, omd wrote:
>> Contract requirements aren't implicit, they're just indirect. How
>> about "SHALL NOT, except where otherwise explicitly permitted"? And
>> stick in "players MAY destroy their own Yaks" or whatever.
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
