I spend 3 VCs to increase Machiavelli's VVLOP by 2 and Lindar's by 1.
7526 20 O woggle Yak Cleanup Grammar Fixes
FOR
7527 10 O Murphy Within measurable distance of its end
FOR
7528 2 50 O omd Voting auctions
AGAINST
7529 20 O omd The Wisconsin
I cash the below promise made by scshunt, specifying G. -G.
Title: (scshunt 2013-06-24 re VCs)
Text: I spend 1 VC to increase the specified player's voting limit by 1.
Author: scshunt
Owner: G.
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 17:05 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
John Smith wrote:
If I were a player, I'd call for reconsideration. But since I'm not,
could someone else please do so?
You should register.
You're possibly missing a bit of history, here; Bucky's a very
long-standing non-player who
I make the following promise, G. Summer Votes and transfer it to Walker:
Text: I vote option X in the Agoran Decision Y, where X and Y are
specified by the casher at the time of cashing.
Cashing condition: It is on or before August 15, 2013.
Non-destruction condition: true
Author destruction
On Jul 15, 2013, at 3:48 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
In this situation, G., by submitting a promise that may take an action
contrary to his rights, has clearly contemplated that the promise may
do so and deemed the consequences acceptable. It is not the place of
the Court to question this action. G.
On 16 Jul 2013 17:45, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 17:05 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
You're possibly missing a bit of history, here; Bucky's a very
long-standing non-player who participates anyway. It actually serves a
useful purpose (e's much more likely to flag
I spend 4 VCs to increase G.'s VVLOP by 4.
I spend 2 VCs to increase Murphy's VVLOP by 2.
I transfer all my remaining VCs to G..
what's going on in okinawa? Well, I play stones
on (1,1) (2,1) and (0,2).
I create the following promise, 'G. secret plan', and transfer it to omd:
Text: I perform as specified in {text} published by the casher when this is
cashed.
Conditions for cashing: {text} contains the string AGORAN MESSAGE, is less than
80 characters in length, and has an SHA-1 hash,
I vote for omd in the general election.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I intend, with support from omd and scshunt, to amend the consitution of
the Best Party by adding 6. Any of {omd, ais523, scshunt} CAN, with the
support of both of the other two, cause this Party to take any action.
I do so.
I spend 2 VCs to increase my VVLOP by 1.
I spend 2 VCs to increase my VVLOP by 1.
I spend 2 VCs to increase my VVLOP by 1.
I spend 2 VCs to increase my VVLOP by 1.
I spend 2 VCs to increase my VVLOP by 1.
I spend 2 VCs to increase my VVLOP by 1.
(It's not clear how many, exactly, succeed, but
I submit the following proposal, and pay Y20 to make it more
distributable:
More Interesting Timing Scams (AI 3, Proposal Fee Y20)
Add a new paragraph to rule 478, just before its last paragraph:
{{{
As an exception to the rest of this rule, no message is a public message
if, during the
I spend 3 VCs to increase Walker's VVLOP by 3.
I vote for Fool in the General Election.
I cash the following promise, created by Walker, specifying Fool:
Text:
I vote for X in the general election, where X is specified by the casher
in the same message as the cashing.
Cashing condition:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I create the following promise, 'G. secret plan', and transfer it to omd:
I transfer this promise to ehird.
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 13:11 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
I vote for Fool in the General Election.
INEFFECTIVE, as the posting period is over. Same for the rest of the
message.
Huh? this was date-stamped 30 seconds before the voting period ended...
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement. (Supporters, please do
so; I don't intend to check this intent later.) Arguments:
Support, it perhaps merits additional discussion at least.
17 matches
Mail list logo
