I wish to be assigned to just one case.
—the Warrigal
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Sprocklem wrote:
> I just wanted to deal with some stuff before I take on the position of
> Arbitor.
>
> The first order of business is judges. To start I assume the people who
> were willing to judge last time, are still willing to judge. I have
> listed these peo
On 2014-09-03 06:03, Luis Ressel wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 22:46:59 -0400
> omd wrote:
>
>> Actually, now that I look at the ruleset, it was never undefined in
>> the first place. "Recordkeepor" probably fits into R2162 (c), and if
>> it doesn't, that clause should be clarified rather than add
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 22:46:59 -0400
omd wrote:
> Actually, now that I look at the ruleset, it was never undefined in
> the first place. "Recordkeepor" probably fits into R2162 (c), and if
> it doesn't, that clause should be clarified rather than adding a new
> one (which doesn't include implicit s
