Re: BUS: Regulations v3

On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > > Title: Regulations v4 > Adoption index: 3.1 > Author: Aris > Co-authors: o, nichdel, ais523 I pay Agora 6 shinies to pend this proposal. -Aris

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Either way you look at it...

On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Ah. CFJs 2086 and 2087. Though under different rules and purpose and > a total of 4 Appeals between them. Actually, the final, final result is fairly clear and relevant, so here it is as gratuitous arguments: CFJs 2086 and 2087 found that the

BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3509 reassigned to Murphy

ais523 wrote: On Wed, 2017-05-24 at 02:14 +0100, Alex Smith wrote: On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 19:20 -0700, Gaelan Steele wrote: I CFJ on these statements: “Any player may take the office of Rulekeepor with 2 support.” [i.e. I got a pink slip] “o committed a cardable offense in issuing a Pink Slip

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Either way you look at it...

Well then: I invoke judgement on the other statement : I invoke judgement on the other statement Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Jun 28, 2017, at 6:47 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Either way you look at it...

On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Quazie wrote: > I don't know, but I just filed two to find out. Gratuitous for Quazie's 2 recent CFJs: CFJ 1267 may be relevant: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?1267

Re: BUS: Either way you look at it...

I CFJ on the following statement: "In the below quoted message, a CFJ was initiated on the phrase 'أدعو إلى إصدار حكم بشأن البيان التالي'" On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 4:16 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > I call for judgement on the following statement : أدعو إلى إصدار حكم بشأن

Re: BUS: Either way you look at it...

I CFJ on the following statement: "In the below quoted message, a CFJ was initiated on the phrase 'I call for judgement on the following statement'" On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 16:16 Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > I call for judgement on the following statement : أدعو إلى إصدار

BUS: Either way you look at it...

I call for judgement on the following statement : أدعو إلى إصدار حكم بشأن البيان التالي

BUS: huh, I thought I sent this already

CFJ: Shinies are assets. Arguments: The recently resurrected rule 2166 says: An asset is an entity defined as such by a rule (hereafter its backing document), and existing solely because its backing document defines its existence. The latest version of Rule 2483 (Economics)

BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3531 assigned to omd

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 07:48 +0100, V.J Rada wrote: >> I retract the 2nd CFJ I filed. I CFJ on the statement >> "A player other than the ADoP may initiate elections >> for an office by announcement if that office has

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Because nobody would give me advice on how to use this

On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 08:56 +0100, V.J Rada wrote: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Alex Smith > wrote: > > > I cause Quazie to earn a Black Ribbon, using the mechanism in rule > > 2492. I award Quazie a Black Ribbon. > > > > [nichdel already got a win out of the

BUS: Because nobody would give me advice on how to use this

I cause Quazie to earn a Black Ribbon, using the mechanism in rule 2492. I award Quazie a Black Ribbon. [nichdel already got a win out of the scam; I'd award a Black Ribbon too, but nichdel is not a player, and I accidentally misworded the scam reward rule, thus don't have enough power to

BUS: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3530 assigned to o

On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 22:05 +0100, V.J Rada wrote: > I CFJ on the statement > "The Japanese message filed by 天火狐 on 27 June deputized him as the > Reportor" Should be "em" not "him", surely? Anyway, this is CFJ 3530. I assign it to o. The CFJ statement is probably intended to refer to this

BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

> On Jun 27, 2017, at 5:15 PM, V.J Rada wrote: > > COE, I also pointed a finger at G last week (for making a fake report, ruled > Shenanigans) Considered and denied, but it’s good feedback nonetheless. I’ll include Shenanigans finger-points in the future; that was an

BUS: Rewording of a CFJ

I retract the 2nd CFJ I filed. I CFJ on the statement "A player other than the ADoP may initiate elections for an office by announcement if that office has been deputized for within the last 2 weeks or no election has occured for that office within the last 90 days. V.J. Rada initiated 3 such