Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7899-7904

I vote as G. does. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: >> 7899* G.2.0 Arbitor's Union G. 1 AP >> 7900* o 2.0 Come What Mayo 1 AP >> 7901* o, [1]3.0

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7899-7904

On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > 7899* G.2.0 Arbitor's Union G. 1 AP > 7900* o 2.0 Come What Mayo 1 AP > 7901* o, [1]3.0 Make Your Home Shine o 6 sh. > 7902* G.1.0 Swit

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7905-7907

I vote AGAINST on all 3. -- >From V.J. Rada

Re: BUS: Frivolous AP spending

I retract "make Cuddlebeam happy". The other one's useful in its own way. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > dangit > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 6:07 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > >> Agoran weeks begin midnight GMT monday. That's already happened a few >> hours ago, I think. And if it

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7905-7907

> On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:01 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > [The Office of the Promotor frowns on having to do extra work for no good > reason. Expect much Malevolent Paper Shuffling.] > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and rem

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7905-7907

I vote as follows: > 7905* CuddleBeam1.0 Shiny Love CuddleBeam 1 AP AGAINST > 7906* Gaelan1.0 Happiness has a cost.Gaelan 1 AP FOR > 7907* CuddleBeam1.0 make Cuddlebeam happy. CuddleBeam 1 AP FOR -Aris

Re: BUS: Frivolous AP spending [reply contains proposal]

Preliminary votes with no effect; I reccomend that when this gets promoted others vote in the same way: > On Sep 24, 2017, at 9:04 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > Week soon over so: > > I create the following Proposal and pend it with 1 AP: > > Title: Shiny Love > Content: Upon enactment of this pr

Re: BUS: Frivolous AP spending

Agoran weeks begin midnight GMT monday. That's already happened a few hours ago, I think. And if it is a new week, I also get to point new fingers. I point not one but two fingers at CB for no good reason. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > Week soon over so: > > I create the f

BUS: Frivolous AP spending

Week soon over so: I create the following Proposal and pend it with 1 AP: Title: Shiny Love Content: Upon enactment of this proposal, for each player who voted AGAINST this proposal and in alphabetical (and transliterated) order, have 10 of their shinies transferred to Agora. Then, for each playe

BUS: Reward

I claim a reward of 5 shinies for publishing the Promotor report. -Aris

BUS: [Regkeepor] ACORN

The ACORN (Agora Nomic Code of Regulations) == TITLE 0 Contains no regulations, and is reserved for the use of the Regkeepor. -- (empty)

Re: BUS: Such is karma

I pend "Such is Karma v2" for 1 AP. -Aris On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I withdraw my previous proposal, "Such is Karma". > > > I submit the following Proposal, AI-1, "Such is Karma v2", co-author 天火狐: > > --

BUS: Such is karma

I withdraw my previous proposal, "Such is Karma". I submit the following Proposal, AI-1, "Such is Karma v2", co-author 天火狐: -- Create the following Rule, 'Such is Karma', Power-1: Karma is a person switch tracked by

BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

I claim a reward of 5 shinies for this report. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 24, 2017, at 6:45 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > > >

BUS: CFJ 3557 judged FALSE

CFJ 3557 (on Motion to Reconsider) [Addendum to my previous verdict, available here [1]] There is some question as to whether precedent supports the idea that "SHALL" implies "CAN by announcement", or only that "SHALL by announcement" does so (see G.'s arguments for a Motion to Reconsider). Firs

BUS: Such is karma

I submit the following Proposal, AI-1, "Such is Karma", co-author 天火狐: -- Create the following Rule, 'Such is Karma', Power-1: Karma is a person switch tracked by the Herald in eir Weekly Report. Karma is an Int

BUS: numerical switch generalization v2

[Eh, I might not get Karma written before the end of the week, and I probably want to proto it for comments again anyway.] I submit the following Proposal, "Numerical switches v2", AI=2 please. I pend it with AP. -- [A genera

BUS: numerical switch generalization

Crap: > If 0 is in the specified values for a numerical switch and no > default is otherwise default, 0 is the default for that switch. I withdraw my proposal, "Numerical switches". (I was hoping to use this to propose Karma this week, I wanted the

BUS: numerical switch generalization

I submit the following Proposal, "Numerical switches", AI=2 please. I pend it with AP. -- [A generalization of natural switches, explicitly defining how mathematical operations work on them, that allows for much greater flexibi

BUS: I'm joining!

Hey nerds! After reading through the public archives for a little over a week to decide whether or not I should join, I decided that I should. -- Reuben Staley