__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
/\ ___\ /\ \_\ \ /\ \ /\ "-.\ \ /\ \ /\ ___\ /\ ___\
\ \___ \ \ \ __ \ \ \ \ \ \ \-. \ \ \ \ \ \ __\ \ \___ \
\/\_\ \ \_\ \_\ \ \_\ \ \_\\"\_\ \ \_\ \ \_\ \/\_\
\/_/ \/_/\/_/ \
PF
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 6:25 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Uh, copy and paste error. I retract the proposal below, and create the
> following.
>
> Title: Really minor fixes
> AI: 3?
> Text
> Amend rule 2415 "Badges" by replacing the text "multiple persons for
> participating in specific event" with
I create the following
Title: Really minor fixes
AI: 3?
Text
Amend rule 2415 "Badges" by replacing the text "multiple persons for
participating in specific event" with "multiple persons for
participating in a specific event".
Amend rule 2492 "Recusal" by adding a full stop after the text "1 -
The
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> Yes, that's exactly what I said. You don't have to, but a lot of that
> report is informal anyway, so do whatever.
I think the only thing that has to happen is the Assessor is
required to resolve the election after a week, announce a winner
(or failed quorum
Sorry this was sent in error, still working on this proposal, barely
halfway through. I retract the below.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 2:05 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Pretty boring proposal. Nothing to see here. Although, of course,
> y'all should read carefully because the Occult Hand is a thing. I'm
> su
Pretty boring proposal. Nothing to see here. Although, of course,
y'all should read carefully because the Occult Hand is a thing. I'm
surprised nobody has even used that yet; people must either have
forgotten about it or be playing a real long game.
I create the below proposal (but do not pend it,
I claim a reward of 5 shinies for publishing this report.
On 11/13/2017 9:44 PM, ATMunn wrote:
[I think I'm going to start including dates in the subject lines of my reports.
It just seems like a convenient thing to have.]
As per my weekly duties as ADoP, I hereby publish the following report.
The Moots rule in the recent SLR contains before it this text "Amend
Rule 911 (Motions and Moots) by replacing its first 2 paragraphs with:
If a judgement has been in effect for less then seven days and has
not been entered into Moot, then:"
I CoE (yes, I know this is informal): The f
I claim a 5 shiny reward for my referee report.
--
>From V.J. Rada
Oops, forgot about that. I accept this CoE.
On 11/13/2017 9:18 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 at 21:14 ATMunn wrote:
As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to
select the winner of the Fearmongor election.
For this decision, the vote collector is the Asses
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 at 21:14 ATMunn wrote:
> As per my duties as ADoP, I hereby initiate the Agoran Decision to
> select the winner of the Fearmongor election.
>
> For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the valid options
> are the candidates (PRESENT is always a valid vote, as are
Actually, I realize some of the language in my recent Cards proposal
may be less than optimal. Specifically
I use AP to call a CFJ with the text: "[A]buses of official power for
personal gain" are "prohibited by law".
Issuing a card CANNOT be done for anything that is not prohibited by
law (see r
TTttPF
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 at 17:01 Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 at 16:43 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>> > > - On various occasions, rulekeepors combined multiple changes made by
>> a
>> > > single proposal into one change in the history. Rule 168
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> >AGAINST. These seem like protections we want - explain why we don't want
> >them?
>
> Because under the new card rules that y'all voted for w/out reading
> (:P) it becomes IMPOSSIBLE to issue those cards, so the SHALL is
> redundant and against policy.
O
I vote:
> 7965* Trigon 3.0 One pronoun fix Trigon 1 AP
FOR
> 7966* ATMunn 1.0 But I already live there!o 1 AP
AGAINST. We are traditionally antipodean.
> 7967* V.J. Rada 1.0 Rhyming sux tbh V.J. Rada 1 AP
For keeping wi
I intend, without objection, to retract all pledges is my possession.
-Aris
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:47 PM VJ Rada wrote:
> Apologies for sending that preemptively to a-b
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:46 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
> > This is the Referee's Weekly Report. Referee's notes are obviou
This is the Referee's Weekly Report. Referee's notes are obviously not
part of the text of pledges.
A
ris, please withdraw your 18 pledges.
Date of this report:
14
Nov 2017
Date of last report:
07
Oct 2017
Recent events:
Tue 24 Oct 2017: o made a pledge
Wed, 25 Oct 2017: Nichdel made
I'm going to rule this point SHENANIGANS. Collaborating is not
illegal, and is therefore punishable only by a pink slip. Pink slips,
which are appropriate only for abuses of power for personal gain,
should be used sparingly. While o did gain personally, and e did use
eir power, the circumstances of
On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 at 18:24 Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
> quorum
Oh how silly of me. I'd completely skimmed over/missed the direct
prohibition, and was thinking of deriving it from first principles
so to speak. Thanks for setting me straight.
I withdraw my most recent CFJ.
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Madeline wrote:
> Gratubitous Argument:
> Rule 2466 ("Acting o
20 matches
Mail list logo
