Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 7993

2017-12-14 Thread ATMunn
I'm leaning towards voting against, but for now, I vote PRESENT. On 12/14/2017 9:35 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: I vote AGAINST. Conditionals are a significant convenience, and they make gameplay more interesting. Removing them should be a last resort. I believe our precedents should be enough to pr

Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 7993

2017-12-14 Thread Aris Merchant
I vote AGAINST. Conditionals are a significant convenience, and they make gameplay more interesting. Removing them should be a last resort. I believe our precedents should be enough to prevent abuse; if not, there is certainly a less extreme legislative solution. -Aris On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 4:5

BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 7993

2017-12-14 Thread Alexis Hunt
I vote FOR. On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 at 21:04 Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor,

BUS: Re: DIS: Arbitor Candidate Needed

2017-12-14 Thread Cuddle Beam
Hopefully someone else contests me lol. I become a Candidate for Arbitor. On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 7:33 PM, ATMunn wrote: > The nomination period for the Arbitor election is going to end on > Saturday, and if nobody runs for it, the election will end with no > winner. We need an Arbitor, so if s