On 2020-06-11 22:49, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
On 2020-06-11 22:26, Rebecca via agora-business wrote:
-- From R. Lee
Who the heck is "R. Lee"?
While I'm at it, I change my nickname to "The Found and Lost Department"
--
The Found and Lost Department
Sorry I retract that proposal and create the following
Title: Chill 2.0 (ironic edition)
AI: 2
Text: Create a power 2 rule called "Excess Proposals" with the text "A
proposal submitted by someone who has already submitted 6 proposals
currently in the proposal pool is an Excess Proposal. The
I create the following proposal
Title: Chill
AI: 2
Text: Create a power 2 rule called "Excess Proposals" with the text "A
proposal submitted by someone who has already submitted 6 prior proposals
that week is an Excess Proposal. The Promotor may, by announcement,
designate an Excess Proposal as
serious comments, you need to distinguish the beverlys, perhaps beverly 1,
2, 3 etc by order of registration. also the "they"s should be "e"s (the
proposal refers to a player in the singular)
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 2:26 PM Rebecca wrote:
> That's it, I change my nickname to "Proposal 8440"
>
That's it, I change my nickname to "Proposal 8440"
see how you like the full logical ruleset NOW
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 2:20 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business <
agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> I submit the following proposal, "namings", AI=1, co-author R. Lee: {enact
> a rule named
I submit the following proposal, "namings", AI=1, co-author R. Lee: {enact
a rule named "names" with the following text: "A player's legal nickname
is 'CFJ X' where X is the number of the last CFJ they judged. Failure to
refer to someone by their legal nickname in public is the class-1 crime
On 6/11/20 10:46 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> I change my nickname to CFJ 3835.
Great. Your ruleset annotations have been updated [0].
[0]: https://agoranomic.org/ruleset/flr-fresh.txt
--
Jason Cobb
On 6/11/2020 7:08 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> If the previous CFJ that I called was found TRUE, then that provides
> evidence for the statement of this CFJ being TRUE: at some point, CFJ
> 3835 "became" G. Nothing would have caused CFJ 3835 to cease being G.,
> which would imply
On 6/11/20 10:08 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> While I'm busy harassing the Arbitor...
>
> I CFJ: "On or about 16 May 2020, CFJ 3835 became G."
> I CFJ: "CFJ 3835 is G."
Whoops, just realized I never explicitly said this in my arguments:
{
CFJ 3835 was assigned to G. on 16 May
While I'm busy harassing the Arbitor...
I CFJ: "On or about 16 May 2020, CFJ 3835 became G."
Arguments:
{
This may sound stupid (and, in fact, it is), but the terminology is
enshrined in Rule 2162/13, with power=3:
> "To flip an instance of a switch" is to make it come to have a
>
forgot an issue that jason brought up a while ago. seriously, if i get
coins for these i'll donate them or whatever.
I submit the following proposal, "old judgements are good judgements",
AI-2, co=author Jason:
Amend Rule 991 (Calls for Judgement) by replacing:
At any time, each
Just to make sure, I act on tcbapo's behalf to transfer all of eir liquid
currencies to me
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:10 AM Rebecca via agora-business <
agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I transfer all of tcbapo's assets to myself by acting on bhalf
>
>
> --
> From R. Lee
>
--
>From R.
I transfer all of tcbapo's assets to myself by acting on bhalf
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 8:37 AM Reuben Staley via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> FORBES FOUR HUNDRED
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 6:11 AM James Cook via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> The June zombie auction has ended. It began 2020-06-04 at 00:37, and
> ended 2020-06-11 at 00:37. All times UTC.
>
> Agora is the auctioneer. In accordance with Rule 2551, the winner of each
>
I wrote:
> Ok ugh last nomic email today I hope.
Hahaha I knew I shouldn't say that I got the power of R991 wrong.
> "quick judicial fix", AI-1.7, co-authors Jason, Publius:
> "non-person judge fix", AI-1.7, coauthor Jason:
I withdraw the two above-referenced proposals from the pool.
I submit
Ok ugh last nomic email today I hope.
I submit the following proposal, "non-person judge fix", AI-1.7, coauthor
Jason:
Amend Rule 991 (Calls for Judgement) by replacing:
Judge is an untracked CFJ switch with
I expunge one blot from myself.
--
nch
Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager
I vote as follows:
> 8431l Aris, ais523 1.0 Proposal Reward Trimming
PRESENT. This is probably a good idea, but I've made a good bit of money
with AI-3 bugfixes, so I'm kind of attached to the clause.
> 8432* Aris, Alexis, Falsifian 3.0 The Administrative State
ENDORSE G.
I submit the following proposal, "quick judicial fix", AI-1.7, co-authors
Jason, Publius:
--
Amend Rule 991 (Calls for Judgement) by replacing:
When a CFJ's judge is unassigned, the Arbitor CAN assign any
eligible player to be its judge by announcement, and
On 6/11/20 6:29 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote:
> Gratuitous:
>
> The Pineapple Partnership was judged to be a person at the time the case
> was assigned, and the Rules of the time made em a person [cites later].
> So it was a legal judgement of the time (which closed the case). Making
Gratuitous:
The Pineapple Partnership was judged to be a person at the time the case
was assigned, and the Rules of the time made em a person [cites later].
So it was a legal judgement of the time (which closed the case). Making
the PP cease to be a person (which happened later) did not
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 6:07 AM Rebecca via agora-official
wrote:
>
> =Metareport=
>
> This is the ADoP’s weekly report, which I deputise for ADoP to publish,
> having intended to do so more than 2 days earlier (and the ADoP having
> missed a week)
>
> Date of last report: 2020-05-24
>
>
On 2020-06-11 15:46, Reuben Staley via agora-official wrote:
COIN BALANCES (self-ratifies)
- -
Coins Active player
=
I point my finger at the H. Arbitor for failing to assign a judge to CFJ
1706 in a timely fashion, although I request that the H. Referee not
punish em too harshly.
CFJ 1706 [0] was judged by the Pineapple Partnership, which at the time,
was legally a person and thus eligible to judge judicial
As of today it has been 31 days since my first Treasuror Weekly Report.
Each week since then, I have published reports each week. Links follow:
[May 4 - 10]
https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg10069.html
[May 11 - 17]
I submit the following proposal, "win indirection", AI-1:
Amend Rule 2553 (Win by Paradox) by replacing:
that case's initiator CAN, by announcement, win the game.
with:
that case's initiator, CAN, by announcement,
I submit the below proposal:
Title: Indictment Fixes
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Co-authors: Jason, Trigon
Amend Rule 2619, "Indictment" by inserting "CAN and" prior to "SHALL initiate".
Amend Rule 2619, "Indictment" by inserting ", by announcement,"
following
I wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling Boringly Worded", AI-1:
I withdraw the above-mentioned proposal from the pool.
I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Barrel Badger Barrel", AI-1:
Create a
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:58 AM Cuddle Beam via agora-business <
agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I’m unsure how much power we have in “defining an entity” for the purposes
> of contract-defined Assets, but eh life is short, I’ll give it a shot.
> Also, this doesn’t violate DADA, rather,
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 3:11 AM Rebecca via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I, the ADoP, intend to flip the interest switch of the Webmastor to
> efficiency, without objection.
>
I object. I think the Webmastor fits better under participation, since eir
report is more
I’m unsure how much power we have in “defining an entity” for the purposes
of contract-defined Assets, but eh life is short, I’ll give it a shot.
Also, this doesn’t violate DADA, rather, it aims to exploit it seeing how
G. was punished for Dark Arts recently. It maybe even has support from AIAN
I wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling C", AI-1:
I withdraw the above-mentioned proposal from the pool.
I submit the following proposal, "Barrel Rolling Boringly Worded", AI-1:
Create a power-1 rule,
I intend to, without objection, amend Rule 2125 by replacing
"proscribed" with "proscribe".
- Falsifian
On 6/7/20 1:29 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote:
> The below CFJ is 3841. I assign it to Jason.
>
> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3841
>
> === CFJ 3841 ===
>
> In the above statement, I issued a
I submit the following proposal, CFJ extensions, AI-1.7:
Amend Rule 591 (Delivering Judgements) by appending the following
paragraph:
If the judge of an open CFJ has not violated a time limit for
assigning it
35 matches
Mail list logo
