I make the following diplonomic proposal named eat the rich
Make the following rule 'after each build phase, the power with the most
units has one of their units randomly destroyed'
+++++++++++
| Entity | cn | wc | jc | lc | vc | wp | bg | pd | xv |
+++++++++++
|*8fingine[1]| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0|
|Agora |2340| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0
On 7/18/20 3:34 PM, ATMunn via agora-business wrote:
> On 7/18/2020 3:03 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
>> On 7/18/20 1:58 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
>>> {
>>>
>>> Replace the following text:
>>>
>>> "This contract may be amended by a Platonic Pirate with the consent of
>>> 2/3rds (rounde
On 7/18/2020 11:27 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I CFJ: "A player CAN send a message to agora-business by some method."
Gratuitous:
It might be good to look at a reductio ad absurdam when it comes to
defining a R2125 method. Following this line of reasoning, we might
decide that a
On 7/18/2020 3:03 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
On 7/18/20 1:58 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
{
Replace the following text:
"This contract may be amended by a Platonic Pirate with the consent of
2/3rds (rounded up) of all Platonic Pirates."
with:
"Any Platonic Pirate CAN propose an a
On Sat, 2020-07-18 at 14:27 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I CFJ: "A player CAN send a message to agora-business by some
> method."
Gratituous arguments:
a) The reasoning in the caller's arguments for this CFJ effectively
says "rule 478 says that players can't be prohibited from se
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, July 18, 2020 2:08 PM, nix wrote:
> As mentioned before (and I will once again confirm it in a reply to this
> email) I'm switching to this email. I'd also like to use the name "nix"
> instead of "nch". I can't remember if the rules allow multiple ema
As mentioned before (and I will once again confirm it in a reply to this
email) I'm switching to this email. I'd also like to use the name "nix"
instead of "nch". I can't remember if the rules allow multiple emails;
if they do I'd like to keep nchagora just in case.
--
nix
Prime Minister, Webm
On 7/18/20 1:58 PM, nix via agora-business wrote:
> {
>
> Replace the following text:
>
> "This contract may be amended by a Platonic Pirate with the consent of
> 2/3rds (rounded up) of all Platonic Pirates."
>
> with:
>
> "Any Platonic Pirate CAN propose an amendment to this contract by
> announce
ATMunn submitted an amendment but it never got the approval, and CB
pointed out a issue with possibly re-applying proposals. So here's
another try.
{
Replace the following text:
"This contract may be amended by a Platonic Pirate with the consent of
2/3rds (rounded up) of all Platonic Pirates."
I motion to reconsider, I don't believe it to be overly hypothetical when
it refers to how Agora itself works. It's a question about Agora's
fundamental way of working.
I humbly request support please, Agorans.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:15 AM N. S. via agora-discussion <
agora-discuss...@agoranom
I favor this CFJ. I have no clue what my arguments are going to be though,
so I'd very much appreciate gratuitous arguments.
-Aris
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 11:28 AM Jason Cobb via agora-business <
agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I CFJ: "A player CAN send a message to agora-business by som
I CFJ: "A player CAN send a message to agora-business by some method."
Arguments:
{
First, I think it is clear that sending a message is an action - it is
something that can be performed.
Rule 478 says that "no Player shall be prohibited from participating in
the Fora". A plain reading of this
On Saturday, July 18, 2020 8:40:11 AM CDT nixnull+agora--- via agora-
discussion wrote:
> (This is nch. I might be switching to this email address, playing around
> with settings right now. I'll send an email from nchagora to prove
> identity.)
>
> If I've submitted any ballots for any proposals l
14 matches
Mail list logo
