For each of the following proposals, I pay a pendant to cause it to
become pending.
* Determinacy is a Good Thing
* Sponsorship is not Co-authorship
* Popularity Contest
I submit the following proposal.
-Aris
---
Title: Popularity Contest
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Aris
Co-authors:
Enact a new power 1.0 Rule entitled "Popularity Contest",
with the following text:
Immediately after the adoption of this rule, Aris wins the
game. Then, for each person who vot
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 6:52 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 5:16 PM Aris Merchant via agora-business
> wrote:
> >
> > I submit the following proposal.
> >
> > -Aris
> > ---
> > Title: Pending is not Co-authorship
> > Adoption index: 1.0
> > Author: Aris
> >
I submit the following proposal.
-Aris
---
Title: Pending is not Co-authorship
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Aris
Co-authors:
[It's always felt weird to me that pending a proposal now
makes you a co-author. That's not what co-authorship
means, IMO. Also, it goes against my mental invariant
that pr
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 4:57 PM Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 1:29 PM ATMunn via agora-business
> wrote:
> > With all that said, I submit (but do not pend) the following proposal.
> >
> > Title: Officializing Discord
> > Adoption index: 3.0
> > Author: ATMun
I submit the following proposal.
-Aris
---
Title: Determinacy is a Good Thing
Adoption index: 1.7
Author: Aris
Co-authors:
[Note that Gaelan's win should have been processed by the time
this is adopted, unless there's an appeal.]
Amend Rule 591, "Delivering Judgements", by removing the text:
On 6/5/2021 2:46 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> I will also say that I am not at all convinced
> that this CFJ provides grounds for a win by
> paradox. Is this a "a CFJ about the
> effectiveness, possibility, or legality of a
> change in the gamestate"? I'd guess no,
> but that's a
Judge's Arguments for CFJ 3907
Gaelan pledged "I pledge to violate this pledge,
with a time window of one day." (Eir other pledge,
which may or may not exist, is substantively equivalent
for the purposes of this CFJ.) A day passed. Did Gaelan
violate this pledge?
There are two possibilities.
1)
I act on behalf of cuddlybanana to Plan to Flip their Ministry Focus to
Legacy (I'm the Puppeteer, by a roll in the discord server)
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 9:18 PM Rose Strong via agora-business <
agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I join this contract
>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 3:15 PM Cuddl
I join this contract
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 3:15 PM Cuddle Beam via agora-business <
agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I consent to a contract with the following text:
>
> Cuddlebeam and cuddlybanana are the sole parties to this contract. One
> or zero parties to this contract are the Puppe
I consent to a contract with the following text:
Cuddlebeam and cuddlybanana are the sole parties to this contract. One
or zero parties to this contract are the Puppeteer. If there is a
Puppeteer, the other party is the Puppet.
The Puppeteer can act on behalf of the Puppet to:
-Plan to Flip their
On 6/5/21 2:20 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> For each of the following titles, I pay a fee of one to cause the most
> recent proposal with that title that I submitted to become pending:
>
> * Anti-AI escalation
>
> * AI voting method clarification
>
> * Supporter/Objector clarification
>
> * Thou shalt n
For each of the following titles, I pay a fee of one to cause the most
recent proposal with that title that I submitted to become pending:
* Anti-AI escalation
* AI voting method clarification
* Supporter/Objector clarification
* Thou shalt not disobey Trigon
* Fixing Festivals
* Emergency Re
I intend, without objection, to clean Rule 591 by adding a full stop to
the end of:
the list item beginning * FALSE
the list item beginning * TRUE
the list item beginning * IRRELEVANT
14 matches
Mail list logo
