On 2/14/12, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
WEEKLY DUTIES
Office Duty Most recent Next deadline* Rule
###
RegistrarPlayersWed 01 Feb Sun 12 Feb~ 2139
I intend to deputise for the Registrar to publish eir report.
I intend to deputise for the Assessor to publish eir report.
(If the attempt to file a motion to reconsider these cases failed, the
rest of this message shall have no effect)
The new arguments do not seem to be relevant. There is no rule that
prevents rules from making acts that the actor cannot control illegal,
and rule 1504(e) suggests that this can
On 2/9/12, Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
TTttPF
7173 1 omd What could possibly go wrong?
AGAINST. Taunting the police serves a purpose; don't stomp it with the
new mechanic.
I retract my previous votes on proposal 7173 and vote AGAINST it.
I submit a proposal with title {Scrap Restricted Behaviour} and
adoption index 3 and text
{
Amend Rule 2125 (Regulation regulations) by replacing the text
{
d) The rules explicitly state that it MAY be performed while
certain conditions are satisfied. Except as allowed by the
On 2/6/12, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
7164 2 Murphy, etc. Grumpy Old Men
AGAINST
7166 3 omd, etc. We've all been ignoring this
PRESENT
7167 2 441344fixing another problem with WotE
FOR
7168 1.7 G.Dignified Silence
PRESENT
7169 3 441344The Person
The rule does apply the SHALL NOT to the judge who [is] assigned to
any judicial case. I judge case 3140 FALSE and case 3141 TRUE.
On 2/6/12, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2012-02-05 at 18:42 -0500, omd wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3145
== CFJ 3145
On 2/6/12, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2012-02-05 at 19:18 -0500, omd wrote:
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:15 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
CoE: The author of this proposal is 441344.
CoE: I am a complete idiot. Actually it was withdrawn.
CFJ: omd is a complete
On 2/2/12, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
THE SHORT LOGICAL RULESET
Last proposal with recorded effect on this ruleset: 7141
Last change to this ruleset: by Proposal 7141
[...]
On 1/26/12, 441344 441...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/26/12, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
THE SHORT LOGICAL RULESET
On 1/30/12, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
With Agoran Consent, I intend to register the OmNom Constitution.
[...]
I support.
other than 441344 within the three months preceding 441344's
registration.
* When 441344 registered, 441344 was a confusing nickname, for the
purposes of Rule 2170.
Arguments: É™
—Machiavelli
I hereby change my nickname from 441344 to The Person Formerly Known As 441344.
I submit
12 matches
Mail list logo
