On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> I intend to deregister Bayushi in four days without objection.
I object.
I object to my deregistration (only), then become inactive if able.
--
Bayushi
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to deregister the following players:
>
>aperfectring
>Bayushi
>Cole Jackson
>Ludwig
>nichdel
>Philomory
>
> CoE: CFJ 3397 is assigned to woggle.
This document is correct (as it is consistent with my declaration of
these actions earlier); the document that lists the details of CFJ
3397 is incorrect and will be corrected. I apologize for this error.
--
Bayushi
CoE: I assign myself to CFJ 3396 and assign omd to CFJ 3397.5 before
rotating the bench instead, then assign myself to CFJ 3394. I
apologize for these errors.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Thelas Staloras
wrote:
> CoE: I assign omd to CFJ3396 and woggle to Criminal Case 3389 instead.
>
CoE: I assign omd to CFJ3396 and woggle to Criminal Case 3389 instead.
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Thelas Staloras
wrote:
> H. Promotor G.:
> Thank you for your aid in the preparation of my report.
> I apologise for its delay.
>
> I recuse with cause Yally from Criminal
H. Promotor G.:
Thank you for your aid in the preparation of my report.
I apologise for its delay.
I recuse with cause Yally from Criminal Case 3389.
I recuse with cause Walker from CFJ 3396.
I recuse with cause Fool from CCFJ 3397.
I assign the number 3397.5 to Teucer's CFJ.
I assign omd to Crimi
Admitted.
A correction will be published within 24 hours.
--
Bayushi
> CotCVACANT 26 Aug 13 20 Oct 13Assumed 400
CoE: I have assumed CotC.
I vote as follows:
7601 - PRESENT
7602 - AGAINST
7603 - AGAINST
7604 - If there is a rulekeepor, ENDORSE RULEKEEPOR. Otherwise, FOR.
7605 - PRESENT
7606 - FOR
7607 - FOR
7608 - AGAINST
7609 - AGAINST
--
Bayushi
I submit the following as argument for the CFJ with id 3398:
"There is no specification that the breach of a rule creating a crime
of equal or higher class need have been avoided by breaking the
lower-or-equal-class rule, only that the breach could not have been
avoided without committing said bre
I submit the following statement for Inquiry:
Suppose a player A has breached two different rules B and C simultaneously,
such that the breach of B was unavoidable (without breaching a rule
creating a crime of higher Class), but not the breach of C, and the crimes
created by the breach of the rules
If possible, I wish to register.
I am (to the best of my knowledge) a first-class person.
If I am now a player: If possible, I announce my nickname to be Bayushi.
12 matches
Mail list logo