I hereby vote:
>5764 O 1 1.0 ais523 That's enough for now
FOR
-zefram
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal CFJ alleging that
>tusho violated Rule 101 by kicking me out of the #really-a-cow
>channel.
I support.
-zefram
ehird wrote:
>With two support I intend to initiate a criminal CFJ against Wooble for
>violating 2170 for claiming to be tusho (an old name of mine).
I support.
-zefram
some spare time.
I go on hold.
-zefram
Ed Murphy wrote:
>tusho and Zefram: (random) don't lynch, don't lynch
Huh, what? I voted to lynch!
-zefram
I sit up.
-zefram
gt;5665 O1 1.5 BobTHJ Hall of Champions
AGAINST*11
>5666 O1 1BobTHJ Proposal Auction
AGAINST*11
>5667 O1 1.9 BobTHJ Some players are more equal than others
AGAINST*11
-zefram
to be assigned
AGAINST
>5656 O1 1ais523 A one-off CotC exit clause
AGAINST*11
>5657 O1 1.5 comex enough already?
AGAINST*11
-zefram
Ian Kelly wrote:
>I intend to appeal the judgements in CFJs 2086-87 with two support.
I support, and point to the analysis that I just gave in a message to a-d.
-zefram
Ian Kelly wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 9:11 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I judge CFJ 2090 as follows:
...
>I intend to appeal this judgement with two support.
I support. The rules are clear about what creates a CFJ.
-zefram
ais523 wrote:
>Without objection, I intend to terminate the pledge which allows
>anything to act on behalf of tusho.
I object.
-zefram
I hereby vote:
>5649 O1 1.7 Quazie Partnerships devolve, and so should unqu...
AGAINST*11
>5650 O1 1.7 Pavitra No frivolous prosecution
AGAINST*11
-zefram
y be distributed.
>I propose the following proposal, named "Demon 4" (AI=1,II=0): {Hello,
>world #4!}
But since you're not a player, none of these are actually proposals.
-zefram
ogative implies choice
AGAINST
>5645 O1 1.7 Murphy Plugging another loophole
FOR*11
>5646 D0 3ais523 Making 2125(e) actually do something
AGAINST
>5647 O0 1ais523 Exilous Monsteredicts
FOR*11
>5648 D1 1Goethe Repeal 2149
AGAINST
-zefram
only given a tally of votes, and left the outcomes implicit.
I think it's valid anyway, but please try again with explicit results
to minimise the uncertainty.
-zefram
eal of this judgement, and recommend a final
judgement of GUILTY.
-zefram
I hereby vote:
>5636 D0 2ais523 Defining Monsterholdors
FOR
>5637 O1 1Quazie Agora is my conditional value
AGAINST*11
>5638 O1 1.7 Murphy Pragmatize initiation of equity cases
FOR*11
>5639 D1 3Murphy Refactor clarity
FOR
-zefram
fication by Agoran Consent; if Agoran Consent is not
>provided, eir action is cancelled.
I support. (Presumably "action" includes announcing intent to act.)
-zefram
comex wrote:
>With Agoran Consent, I intend to amend the text of
>? by adding this paragraph:
>
>If ehird is ever a player, any person CAN act on behalf of em to
>deregister em by announcement.
I support.
-zefram
I hereby vote:
>5634 O1 1.7 Taral Specific crinimality
FOR*11
>5635 O1 1.7 SgeoImpeachment
AGAINST*11
-zefram
Sgeo wrote:
>With Agoran Consent, I act on behalf of Agora to award myself and all
>supporters a Win.
I believe this is ineffective for lack of specificity. Specifically,
the announcement of intent was not specific about to whom wins were to
be awarded.
-zefram
Elliott Hird wrote:
>I intend, with Agoran Consent, to act on behalf of Agora to award a
>win to every person.
I object.
-zefram
milar statements in some circumstances trigger game state changes
that make those statements true.
-zefram
Contracts
FOR*10
>5629 D1 2comex Preparing for ostracism
AGAINST
>5630 D1 2comex One-off ostracism
AGAINST
>5631 O1 1.7 BobTHJ Sit in the corner and think about what y...
AGAINST*10
>5632 O0 1Murphy Fill the gap
AGAINST*10
>5633 O1 1Ivan Hope Fugality
AGAINST*10
-zefram
ie Let my Agora go
FOR*10
>5595 D1 2Murphy No more half-hearted causes
AGAINST
>5596 O1 1Murphy Rightsizing
FOR*10
>5597 O1 1.5 SgeoBreaking Contracts
AGAINST*10
>5598 O0 1Wooble Eliminate Redundancy
FOR*10
-zefram
arty to an equation is not currently a
>Rules-defined obligation.
I support all of these appeals. Judge Quazie is grossly mistaken
regarding how devolution of obligations operates.
-zefram
I object to all currently-outstanding attempts to act on behalf of Agora.
-zefram
Quazie wrote:
>Well I nominate Pavitra, as ZEFRAM tried to do it, and I think E is right.
I second Quazie's nomination of Pavitra.
-zefram
I hereby change my key to G.
-zefram
gain an A note.
In recognition of Agora's Birthday, I hereby spend the notes of the
following rendition of "Happy Birthday" to satisfy the Winning Condition
of Musicianship:
D D E D G Gb / D D E D A G / D D D B G Gb E / C C B G A G
-zefram
really
want a get-out like that it should have a longer auto-exile)
>5584 D1 2ais523 It wasn't that interesting anyway
PRESENT
-zefram
ihope wrote:
>Just to speed things along or something, I intend to make the Points
>Relay Service a contract with myself as contestmaster without three
>objections.
I object.
-zefram
Quazie wrote:
>I intend to make the Points Relay Service a contest with myself as
>contestmaster without three objections.
I object.
-zefram
Elliott Hird wrote:
>I intend to make the Points Relay Service a contract with myself as
>contestmaster without three objections.
I object.
-zefram
Quazie wrote:
>I intend to make the Points Relay Service a contract with myself as
>contestmaster without three objections.
I object.
-zefram
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>1. This is a public contract under the rules of Agora. The name of
>this contract is The Agoran Civil Service Union.
I agree to the ACSU.
-zefram
Alexander Smith wrote:
>Without objection, I intend to terminate the pledge which allows
>anything to act on behalf of ehird.
I object.
-zefram
nkrupt
PRESENT
>5575 O1 1Murphy Call a spade a spade
PRESENT
>5576 O1 1Murphy AFO housekeeping
PRESENT
-zefram
Ian Kelly wrote:
>Also, I intend to deregister the Protection Racket with Agoran
>Consent, per R2144.
I support.
-zefram
Quazie wrote:
>Well, I intend to deregister the Reformed Bank of Agora with Agoran
>Consent, per the very same rule as noted above.
I support.
-zefram
Ed Murphy wrote:
>Wooble wrote:
>> I judge CFJ 2026 FALSE.
>
>I intend, with two support, to appeal this judgement.
I support the appeal.
-zefram
3
AGAINST*10
-zefram
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>For Tailor, the valid options are ERIS, WOOBLE, and QUAZIE.
I vote ERIS.
>For Herald, the valid options are IVAN HOPE and GOETHE.
I vote GOETHE.
-zefram
win
AGAINST*10
>5561 D2 3ais523 Known Gamestate
AGAINST
>5562 D3 3ais523 Agorans Against Paradox Escalation
FOR
>5563 O2 1ais523 Switchy Contests
FOR*10
-zefram
xist at the present time.
I'm not counting any non-persons as coauthors.
I hereby initiate a criminal case with Quazie as defendant,
alleging that e violated rule 2149 by publicly claiming in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> that
Echidna and Typhon are coauthors (or a coauthor) of the proposal that
e submitted in that message.
-zefram
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>I nominate Ivan Hope CXXVII, comex, and Zefram as Herald.
I decline.
-zefram
Ed Murphy wrote:
>I agree to the following:
>
>1) The name of this public contract is The Werewolves of Agora Nomic.
...
I agree to this contract.
-zefram
Murphy Clerk disinterest
FOR*10
>5553 D1 2Murphy Belle
FOR
>5554 D1 3Ivan Hope Isn't that just silly?
AGAINST
> D2 3 ais523
AGAINST
-zefram
I vote for root in the election for assessor.
-zefram
Elliott Hird wrote:
>I intend, with Agoran Consent, to act on behalf of Agora to award a
>win to Teh Cltohed Mna Ni Teh Drak Woh Wtaches Adn Nevre Sasy A Wrod
>Execpt Wehn Psoessed Yb Dmeons Mcuhly Precocupied.
I object.
-zefram
I hereby vote:
>5546 D0 2ais523 Monstrous Decrees
FOR
-zefram
Quazie wrote:
>COE: you missed my proposal "let me live" which was sent to backup.
Denied: you weren't a player at the time, and so couldn't submit a
proposal. (Of course, if the CFJs find otherwise, I'll process the
proposal then.)
-zefram
Roger Hicks wrote:
>COE: You missed my proposal "Empower the Notary"
Admitted. It'll be in the next batch.
-zefram
ird AGORA
AGAINST*10
-zefram
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>I harvest 5540, a Democratic Proposal, to gain 4 points.
CoE: 5540 is not a Democratic Proposal. It is an integer.
-zefram
I hereby vote:
>5538 D1 3comex
FOR
>5539 O1 1.7 comex An elephant sometimes forgets
AGAINST*10
>5540 D0 3ais523
FOR
-zefram
Regulation
FOR
>5537 D1 2Murphy Foreign trade
AGAINST
-zefram
I hereby vote:
>5528 D1 3ais523
AGAINST
>5529 D0 3ais523
AGAINST
>5530 O1 1comex
FOR*10
>5531 D2 3Murphy Rules as Binding Agreement
AGAINST (with regrets: nice attempt, but there are critical flaws;
review to follow)
-zefram
55, there is no general mechanism giving effect to
announcements of permitted actions.
-zefram
I hereby vote:
>5518 D1 2Murphy Prevent last-minute unwanted nominations
FOR
>5519 D1 2Murphy Allow resignation
AGAINST
>5520 O0 1.7 Murphy Fix OVERLOOKED
AGAINST*10
-zefram
I hereby vote:
>5514 D0 2avpxJudgement of Monsters
FOR
>5515 O1 1ehird
AGAINST*10
>5516 O1 1Goethe Anarchy
AGAINST*10
>5517 O0 1Wooble Fix IADoP Report requirements
FOR*10
-zefram
I hereby vote AGAINST proposal 5513.
-zefram
Ed Murphy wrote:
>== Equity Case 1927 ==
...
>Judge Wooble's Arguments:
>
>1. Each first-class party to this equation (the first-class members of
...
CoE: that's the judgement, not the judge's arguments.
-zefram
Mandate II
AGAINST
-zefram
votes any more
FOR*10
>5507 O1 1.7 rootSymmetrize equity cases
FOR*10
-zefram
Ed Murphy wrote:
>Assigned to Zefram (panelist): (as of this message)
No it's not. I'm supine.
-zefram
I vote FOR proposal 5503.
-zefram
I hereby vote:
>5500 O0 1.5 Murphy Don't require a no-op
FOR*10
>5501 D0 2avpxIt's Alive!
FOR
>5502 O0 1.5 Pavitra Nitpicking Contract
FOR*10
-zefram
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>I intend, with the consent of my co-panelists, to have the panel judge
>REMAND in both 1890a and 1891a, with instructions to the judge to
>consider the text of Rule 2019 as it existed at the time the CFJs were
>initiated.
I support both.
-zefram
Murphy No uncontested elections
FOR
>5498 O1 1.7 Goethe Agree2Support2
FOR*10
>5499 D1 2Goethe Fixing Elections v2
FOR
-zefram
OT. (This is a vote in favour of the player root holding the
office, not an endorsement of root's vote.)
-zefram
Ed Murphy wrote:
>Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 15:18:20 -0700
>
>== CFJ 1922 ==
>Assigned to Zefram: (as of this message)
To my great shame, I'm late on this judicial obligation. I hereby
lie down. (I
comex wrote:
>CoE: I submitted a proposal yesterday in my message with Message-ID
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Duh, admitted. I got it wrong again.
-zefram
ihope wrote:
>Zefram, if there are any other parties to the Pineapple Partnership,
>please tell me who they are.
Ah, I guess this is the end of the silent-partner era. When the PP
agreement became public, with me publishing the text, I did inform the
notary privately of the full set of p
I hereby retract all my previous votes on proposal 5490.
I hereby vote AGAINST*10 on proposal 5490.
-zefram
I object to the nominations of BobTHJ and comex for ambassador. I support
the nomination of woggle for ambassador.
-zefram
I hereby vote:
>5490 O1 1.7 Goethe Agree2Support
FOR*10
-zefram
I hereby vote:
>5487 O1 1Murphy Spelling it out
FOR*10
>5488 D2 2Ivan Hope
AGAINST
>5489 D0 2Murphy VLOD decay
AGAINST
-zefram
I intend to install root as CotC, with Agoran Consent and eir consent.
-zefram
of one member of the panel.
-zefram
Ed Murphy wrote:
>== Equity Case 1915 ==
>
>Judge woggle's Arguments:
>
>0. The text of this equation CAN be modified using any mechanism that
...
CoE: that's not the judge's arguments, that's the judgement. There were
arguments as well.
-zefram
Ed Murphy wrote:
> Appeal 1897a
>
>Assigned to woggle (panelist): 01 Mar 2008 19:01:07 GMT
>Assigned to Zefram (panelist): 01 Mar 2008 19:01:07 GMT
>Assigned to Iammars (panelist): 01 Mar 2008 19
I hereby vote:
>5485 D1 2rootGeneralize official duties
FOR
>5486 O1 1.5 Goethe keeping informed
AGAINST*10
-zefram
ymmetric holidays
AGAINST (still ought to replace the preceding paragraphs too)
-zefram
nie is awarded a Stalk. At the end of
>each week, if a player has more Stalks than all other players and this
>contract can award points, all of that player's Stalks are destroyed
>and that player is awarded as many points as possible.}}
I object. That change would make it too easy to get points.
-zefram
With the consent of the other two panel members, I hereby cause the
panel in CFJ 1897a to judge OVERRULE to TRUE, with these arguments:
The judge in CFJ 1899 determined, with good arguments, that BobTHJ is
a player. Judge BobTHJ has not given any reason to doubt this precedent.
-zefram
I hereby vote:
>5478 D1 2Murphy VLOD decay
PRESENT
>5479 D1 3Goethe God-emperor I
AGAINST
>5480 D1 3Goethe God-emperor II
AGAINST
-zefram
I hereby vote:
>5476 D0 2Murphy Spelling/grammar check
AGAINST (the lowercasing of office names is deliberate)
>5477 O1 1.5 Murphy Contract cleanup
AGAINST*10 (insufficient clarity, I fear lurking bugs)
-zefram
Ed Murphy wrote:
>I assign 1897a to the panel of woggle, Zefram, and Iammars.
I intend to cause the panel in CFJ 1897a to judge OVERRULE to TRUE.
Arguments:
The judge in CFJ 1899 determined, with good arguments, that BobTHJ is
a player. Judge BobTHJ has not given any reason to doubt t
f consent having been granted.
In any case, for this CFJ I do not have to rule on whether Iammars
has consented by now. I only have to rule on whether e consented
in the message in question, which e did not in any adequate manner.
I judge FALSE.
-zefram
t: the waiver clause is redundant (and ugly), because the
condition that triggers the waiver cancels the requirement)
>5475 D1 2Murphy Asset unsmashing
FOR
-zefram
ricter.
-zefram
Separate axes, separate rules
AGAINST*10 (OK in principle, but wording needs revision)
-zefram
erity. I shall not give effect
to the caller's attempt to persecute the ninny. I therefore sentence
pikhq to CHOKEY for pi seconds. May Eris have mercy on eir soul.
-zefram
I join Enigma.
-zefram
Josiah Worcester wrote:
>Andre Champion (by proposal)
> Crystal Cup
> Left in a Huff
Claim of error: you omitted Andre's patent title of .
-zefram
I vote FOR proposal 5459.
-zefram
I hereby vote:
>5458 O1 1.5 woggle Secure the court II
AGAINST (should have been disinterested)
-zefram
Murphy Refactor initiation requirements
FOR
>5456 O1 1.5 Goddess Er Secure the court
FOR*10
>5457 O1 1Murphy Proposal reporting requirements
AGAINST*10 (there's a good reason why proposal distributions lacking
those data are valid albeit illegal)
-zefram
comex wrote:
>I intend (with 2 support) to appeal OscarMeyr's judgements of CFJs 1890-1
I support both.
-zefram
1 - 100 of 670 matches
Mail list logo
