So, 11 days ago I received an email from Ørjan saying that the lists
weren't working. As I responded at the time (and e then forwarded to
a-d):
> Some Python processes were in an infinite loop eating all the CPU.
> Bizarrely, I think the cause is some kind of bug in Debian's patched
> Python, as
Proposal: No scam TIME OUTs (AI=2)
Amend Rule 1504 by replacing "When a sentence of TIME OUT goes into
effect" with "When a sentence of TIME OUT has been in effect
continuously for four days".
[12:28 < eelpout> So I was going to: TIME OUT you, resolve election,
assume Gov Waste and Herald, then M
I initiate an election for Governmental Waste and nominate myself..
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:05 AM, comex wrote:
> (The cross-post spam is required by R478.)
> I intend, without objection, to make the forum now located at
> agora-business@agoranomic.org Public.
> I intend, without objection, to make the forum now located at
> agora-offic...@agoran
(The cross-post spam is required by R478.)
I intend, without objection, to make the forum now located at
agora-business@agoranomic.org Public.
I intend, without objection, to make the forum now located at
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org Public.
I intend, without objection, to make the forum now locat
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Mister Snuggles wrote:
>> i also call a cfj on the statement "the executor of this public message
>> cannot be determined with reasonable effort".
CFJ: A public message sent by mr.snu...@gmail.com has caused the
initiation of a CFJ.
Arguments: Although nickname
I hereby pay a fee to move ehird up a position in the List of
Succession, as compensation for supporting the appeal.
Proposal: Erratification
Ratify the following incorrect document: { 1 + 1 = 3 }
Proposal: individualism (AI=2, II=0, Distributable)
Repeal Rule 2303 (Teams), Rule 2304 (The Referee), Rule 2305 (Fans),
and Rule 2306 (Team Tactics).
As many times as possible, I pay a fee to destroy an erg in The
Pariah's possession.
As judge of CFJ 2857, I publish the following /incorrect/ judicial declarations:
{ G.'s position on the List of Succession is unknown. }
{ coppro's position on the List of Succession is unknown. }
{ omd's position on the List of Succession is unknown. }
{ woggle's position on the List of Successio
I intend, without objection, to clean Rule 2317 so that it reads:
When an interested proposal consisting of exactly 1337 words
(excluding information like name or adoption/interest index) is
enacted, its proposer CAN in a timely fashion award emself a
Leadership Token.
I intend, with notice, to Bestow Favors.
I intend, without objection, to deregister each of coppro, ais523,
Epaeris, Taral, woggle, Andon, allispaul, and Spitemaster.
I intend, without objection, to clean Rule 2199 by replacing:
(+L) A player qualifies for a Lime Ribbon, if e was the
with:
(+L) A player qualifies for a Lime Ribbon if e was the
Proposal: Demarcation (AI=2, II=1, Urgent, Distributable via fee)
Make all players Unmarked.
I trade the Queen of Diamonds to G.: http://i.imgur.com/L8s67.jpg
Please let me know what card I get in return.
(I consider us both Ministers because we hold offices.)
Having given notice, I initiate a new journey. Here is the map:
@>---@
(All Objects In Space are destroyed, including the so-called Robot.)
I retract my previous proposal "OK Go" and submit this new one:
Proposal: OK Go (AI=3, II=1, Distributable via fee)
[I've complained repeatedly about the length of time currently
required to adopt proposals, which can have a significant negative
effect on the game. Since the current proposal vol
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: Super Robot Powers (AI=1, II=1, coauthor)
I pay a fee to make this Distributable.
If I have enough ergs, I pay a fee to award myself a Capacitor.
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 12:03 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>
>> ehird penguinoftheg...@gmail.com 26 Feb 09 S
>
> ehird hasn't done anything yet again. I intend, without objection, to flip
> activity to inactive.
I object because "ei
Proposal: Make erg accumulation somewhat easier (AI=2, Distributable via fee)
Amend Rule 2284 by replacing
- A player CAN award emself a capacitor for a charge of 3 ergs.
with:
- A player CAN award emself a capacitor for a charge of 2 ergs.
[I think this would go well with the Pariah
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 03:55, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2830
>>
>> == Criminal Case 2830 (Interest Index = 0) ===
>>
>
I intend, with 3 support, to start a new journey.
I change my name to omd.
I stand up.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Keba wrote:
> After some of my Proposals were declined, because they were too
> complicated (at least for newcommers), I decided to take the challenge
> to join Agora. That‘s about one week ago.
I transfer a prop from myself (for being old hat by now) to Keba (for
CFJ: There is a Journey in place.
Arguments: Mea culpa. I should have made it clear in the original
batch of proposals how a journey ends. While the rules imply in some
places that the journey ends when the Shuttle is warped, nothing
actually says that.
Proposal: OK Go (AI=3, II=1, Distributable via fee)
[I've complained repeatedly about the length of time currently
required to adopt proposals, which can have a significant negative
effect on the game. Since the current proposal volume really isn't
all that high, I think that BlogNomic-style imme
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I transfer a prop from comex, for this, to Keba, for being a new player who
> actually remembered to grant emself a White Ribbon.
I transfer a prop from Wooble, for amending the rule to make everyone
remember what ribbons they deserve an
Note: Some of these actions may fail.
I award ais523 a Blue Ribbon.
I award allispaul a Blue Ribbon.
I award Andon a Blue Ribbon.
I award comex a Blue Ribbon.
I award coppro a Blue Ribbon.
I award ehird a Blue Ribbon.
I award Epaeris a Blue Ribbon.
I award G. a Blue Ribbon.
I award Murphy a Blue
Proposal: More clarifications (AI=1, II=0, Distributable)
[Clarify the existence of wormholes and what it means to be warped.]
Amend Rule 2299, or the text of the contest "Space Alert" if Rule 2299
was repealed, by replacing:
By default, there is no journey in place.
with:
A journey is i
CFJ: comex has a Leadership Token.
Arguments:
Does disappearing count as being destroyed? If not, what is the
shuttle's position?
If it matters, the Shuttle reached the second wormhole while it was
impossible to destroy it (see previous CFJs). The rules were then
amended to allow it
763c776
requirement to submit that judgment within a time limit.
768c781,788
judgment within a time limit.
I intend, without objection, to clean each
Proposal: Contests (AI=2, Distributable via fee)
Co-author: G.
Create a new Power-1 Rule entitled "Contests":
A player CAN make a non-contest document into a contest without
3 objections; he then becomes that contest's contestmaster. The
document should contain a list of instru
alid options on each decision
> are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote). Each proposal is
> hereby assigned the corresponding ID number listed with it.
>
> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> 6766 P 1 1.0 Yally It was a good try
AGAINST
> 6767 P 0 1.0
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> Sorry again for this mess. I also disagree with your calculations of
> cost: the force fields cost 23, 24 and 25 points respectively, since
> the delta increases more than the distance to the shuttle does for
> each successive threat. First
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
wrote:
> Has the map been posted yet, or is it just me who can't find it? I
> need it to calculate the initial number of threat points, and of
> course to include in my report wholesale.
So, I was trying to be clever by waiting as long as possible b
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Proposal 6759 (Purple, AI=1.0, Interest=1) by coppro
>
> Ill-conceived
>
> Repeal Rule 2290.
> Amend Rule 2279 by replacing the first bullet with:
> (1) Take the value 3.
> Repeal Rule 2134.
> Amend Rule 2284 by removing
> - A pla
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> the
> announcement would still cause "all those persons" specified in the
> proposal (not just those listed in the win announcement) to win.
I support coppro's appeal, as the judge hasn't fully explained why,
out of two competing sets of pers
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Murphy's arguments are correct. FALSE. I stand up.
I transfer a prop from Wooble to coppro because my neural impulses
caused me to type a message starting with "I transfer a prop from
Wooble to coppro". Something about established precedent on
This is a win announcement: A proposal (6740) awarding a win to comex
has been adopted.
(What? It's true, even if the proposal also awarded a win to other players.)
CFJ: As a result of the above win announcement, a person other than
comex satisfied the Winning Condition of Legislation.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> 6763 P 1 1.0 Yally Win by Respect
FOR (you should add a Losing Condition of Disrespect :p)
> 6764 P 2 2.0 coppro Website Fix
FOR
> 6765 P 1 3.0 comex
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> 6765 P 1 3.0 comex Adoption Without Objection
> AGAINST (Whether or not I like the idea in general - I haven't
> decided - it doesn't give consideration to proposal/decision ID
> numbers, a very lo
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:40 AM, comex wrote:
> (proposals)
Proposal: Speed up the game (Distributable via fee)
Amend Rule 2301 by replacing "If the day began a new week, each" with "Each".
[The rewards are too low for such drawn-out play.]
Proposal: stolen from G. (II=0, Distributable)
Amend Rule 2300 by replacing "During this time any other player can"
with "During this time any other player who was on the Bridge when the
button was pushed can".
[Support can come from anywhere, but where else would you initiate a
mutiny from but the
I create a new Threat:
name: Asteroid
map symbol: .
maximum hit points: 13
delta: 0
explosion value: 0
attack value: 0
scouting value: 0
starting position: 2
This should be pretty easy to defeat, but there are only two hours
before the Shuttle rams into it...
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> I intend, with 4 supporters, to initiate an election to decide the
> holder of the PSM office. comex's last weekly report as PSM was in
> May.
I resign PSM.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> 6751 G 1 3.0 Murphy cron
> I pay a fee to make this democratic. I vote AGAINST.
I vote AGAINST as well.
Proposal: Adoption Without Objection (AI=3, Distributable via fee)
Amend Rule 106 by replacing:
If the option selected by Agora on this decision is ADOPTED,
then the proposal is adopted, and unless other rules prevent it
from taking effect, its power is set to the minimum of fou
Having given notice, I initiate a new Journey. I will start creating
Threats in 24 hours, and post the map of this journey in a week.
I CFJ on the statement: "comex has a Leadership Token." Arguments:
Arguably "all objects In Space are destroyed" applies to the S
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein
wrote:
> There is no active journey.
> There are no objects In Space.
> There are no charges.
> There are no threat points.
> There is no difficulty.
> There is no shuttle.
> There are no missles.
There is no spoon.
For each Undistributable proposal in the Proposal Pool, I pay a fee to
make it Distributable.
I intend, with notice, to initiate a new journey.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Proposal 6745 (Purple, AI=1.0, Interest=0) by coppro
> Huh?
>
> [coppro wins.]
CFJ: Proposal 6745 is a proposal awarding a win to one or more persons.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> *6747 OP3 1.0 Tiger Space Alert
I hereby assign the rules created by this proposal ID numbers as follows:
* Space Alert
Rule 2297: Objects In Space
Rule 2298: The Shuttle
Rule 2299: Journeys and the Enemy
Ru
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:39 PM, comex wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to clean the rule entitled "Buttons"
> (which I'll assign an ID number shortly) by replacing "increse" with
> "increase".
Also, I intend, without objection, to clean the rule e
I intend, without objection, to clean the rule entitled "Buttons"
(which I'll assign an ID number shortly) by replacing "increse" with
"increase".
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Proposal 6740 (Purple, AI=1.0, Interest=1) by ais523
> The first rule of this proposal is...
>
> Award a win to player who did not acknowledge the existence of this
> proposal in a public or discussion forum after the time it was submitted
> and b
I vote FOR on all Agoran Decisions in their voting period.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:00 AM, System Administrator
wrote:
CoE: Wooble is not the Distributor.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:04 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 12:56 -0400, comex wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> > I intend to appeal this ruling with 2 support.
>>
>> I support.
>
> I also support.
With 2 support, I appeal.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I intend to appeal this ruling with 2 support.
I support.
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Note: There are no Proposals to distribute this week.
I pay a fee to make each Undistributable proposal Distributable.
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 06/13/2010 02:37 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>
>> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2805
>>
>> === CFJ 2805 (Interest Index = 0)
>>
>> Tiger created a Fragment in the above-quoted me
Proposal: Some repeals (AI=3, Distributable via fee)
Repeal the rules with the following titles:
- Officer's Proposals
- Judge's Proposals
- Induction
[Nobody uses them.]
Proposal: Proposal Amendment (AI=3, Distributable via fee)
Comment: This is identical to a previous proposal that was 9-0 but
failed quorum, plus my later fix.
Amend Rule 106 by replacing:
A player CAN remove (syn. retract, withdraw) a proposal e
authored from the Proposal Pool by anno
I retract my proposal "Clarify inconsequentiality mk 2", and submit
the following replacement:
Proposal: Clarify inconsequentiality mk. 2 (AI=3, II=0, Distributable)
[Oops, the original passed.]
Amend Rule 754 by replacing:
(1) A difference in spelling, grammar, whitespace,
capi
I transfer a prop from myself to ais523 because I have the lowest
number of props and he has the highest number of props.
Proposal: Clarify inconsequentiality mk. 2 (AI=3, Distributable via fee)
[If a current proposal attempted to quote a rule but misspelled its
text, I wouldn't be quite sure how to respond as Rulekeepor: Rule 105
seems to conflict with Rule 754 about whether the difference is
spelling is consequenti
ummary at the top of the distribution is
> for informative purposes only and does not constitute a listing of
> essential parameters of the decisions.
>
> NUM II AI SUBMITTER CHAMBER TITLE
> 6734 1 3.0 comex Purple Effect Cleanup
> 6735 1 1.0 coppro Purp
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:13 AM, comex wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to make allispaul inactive.
> I intend, without objection, to make Andon inactive.
> I intend, without objection, to make Epaeris inactive.
> I intend, without objection, to make Spitemaster inactive
When recording the effects of proposal 6571 (last November), I
accidentally removed the following definition of a proposal:
A proposal is a fixed body of text which has been made into a
proposal using a process specifically described in the Rules.
because the proposal only specified t
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> NUM II AI SUBMITTER CHAMBER TITLE
> 6731 1 2.0 G. Purple Threat Level Green
AGAINST
> 6732 1 3.0 comex Purple Clarify inconsequentiality
FOR
> 6733 1 2.0 Wooble Red Better Emergenc
I intend, without objection, to make allispaul inactive.
I intend, without objection, to make Andon inactive.
I intend, without objection, to make Epaeris inactive.
I intend, without objection, to make Spitemaster inactive.
I intend, without objection, to make Warrigal inactive.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to change the publicity of ##nomic on
> irc.freenode.net to Foreign.
>
> --Wooble
I object.
Proposal: Effect cleanup (AI=3, Distributable via fee)
Amend Rule 106 by removing:
This rule takes
precedence over any rule which would permit a proposal to take
effect.
and:
It d
I spend a fee to initiate an election for Registrar.
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> NUM II AI SUBMITTER CHAMBER TITLE
> 6728 1 3.0 comex Purple Amendment
FOR
> 6729 1 1.0 coppro Purple He Had To Do It
AGAINST
> 6730 2 2.0 coppro Purple weird
FOR
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> The term "greater
> than" is, at present, nonsensical when comparing rules.
>
> I judge UNDETERMINED.
I transfer a prop to Wooble for a sane judgement (from myself, because
I have enough props now).
Proposal: Clarify inconsequentiality (AI=3, Distributable via fee)
Amend Rule 754 by replacing:
(1) A difference in spelling, grammar, or dialect,
with:
(1) A difference in spelling, grammar, whitespace,
capitalization, or dialect,
Amend Rule 2221 to read:
Any player
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:49 AM, comex wrote:
> comex 3 3 -1 5
> coppro 4 7 -1 10
CoE: The spendings noted above occurred before the start of this week,
so I have 6 ergs and coppro has 11 ergs. Accepted.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> This message serves to resolve the election for the holder of the
> office of PSM. There are no eligible candidates for this
> office; it remains empty.
I assume the office of PSM.
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> I deputize for the Granulator to publish the following Report and assign
> ID numbers to fragments as follows:
>
> 1. comex (4 May 2010 18:03:56 -0400)
> [see below for text of fragment]
CoE: This fragment does not hav
On Sunday, May 16, 2010, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Voting is extended till May 22 at 17:48:43 UTC. Votes so far:
>
> 6721 OP0 3.0 coppro Titularity
FOR
> 6722 OG1 3.0 Murphy Titles can be cleaned too
FOR
> 6723 D 1 2.0 comex
FOR
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> NUM II AI SUBMITTER CHAMBER TITLE
> 6724 1 3.0 Spitemaster Green Agora Should Stay A Nomic
I change my vote to AGAINST.
Proposal: Proposal Amendment (AI=3)
Amend Rule 106 by replacing:
A player CAN remove (syn. retract, withdraw) a proposal e
authored from the Proposal Pool by announcement.
with:
A player CAN remove (syn. retract, withdraw) a proposal e
authored from the Proposal Pool, or
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> NUM II AI SUBMITTER CHAMBER TITLE
> 6724 1 3.0 Spitemaster Green Agora Should Stay A Nomic
FOR
> 6725 0 2.0 coppro Purple Take Three
FOR
> 6726 1 1.7 coppro Purple Reassign the name
FOR
> 6727 2 3.0 co
I publish the following fragment:
A vector is defined as a pair (x, y), where x and y are integers. The
distance between two vectors is defined as the sum of the absolute
differences of the components (|x2 - x1| + |y2 - y1|). The magnitude
of a vector is defined as the distance from that vector
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I intend, without 3 objections, to set these cases' IIs to 2.
I object.
> I intend, without 2 objections, to set these cases' IIs to 3.
I object.
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Proposal: Reassign the name (AI=1.7, II=1, Distributable)
>> {{{
>> Amend each rule in numerical order by replacing each instance of
>> REASSIGN (case-sensitive) with REMIT.
>> }}}
>>
>> -coppro
>
> I pay a fee to make this Distributable.
>
> I p
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Can someone who is unambiguously a Senator (woggle, perhaps) please
> end this Emergency Session if it is in progress, to reduce ambiguity?
>
> Thanks
I intend, with two Senate support, to call an Emergency Session.
I submit the attached image as a Fragment.
<>
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ID: 6719
> AUTHOR: coppro
> TITLE: Nonzero Fee Fix
> PROPOSAL TEXT:
> Amend Rule 2283 (Fees) by inserting
Amendment fails because it's unclear where to insert the text.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Arguments: The power-3 rule 2141, by insisting that rules are strictly
> ordered, implies that it's possible to have a meaningful
> less-than/greater-than comparison between them.
Gratuitous: It's meant to use the definition in Rule 2161 which,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:11 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> AUTHOR: comex
> TITLE:
> AI: 1.0
> II: 1
> CHAMBER: Purple
>
> PROPOSAL TEXT:
> Create a new Power-1 Rule which reads as follows:
>
> As allowed by Rule 683, this rule places the follo
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> NUM II AI SUBMITTER CHAMBER TITLE
> 6713 0 3.0 Murphy Green Eliminate past repetitive wins
AGAINST
> 6714 0 2.0 coppro Purple Fix Fix
FOR
> 6715 1 3.0 comex Purple Protect Trophies
AGAINST
>
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Charles Reiss wrote:
>> 6712 0 3.0 comex Purple
> AGAINST (AI = 3???)
Oops, I have the instinctive feeling that trophy rules should be
high-Power and must have thought R2105 was.
Proposal (AI=3): Protect Trophies
{
Change the power of Rule 17
e 2274
(Chicken Coups) or Rule 2275 (Government).
> Amend Rule 2203 (Hawkishness) to read as follows:
Note that the only effect of this replacement is to remove the text ",
and poorly qualified to be assigned as judge of any equity case."
> ID: 6705
> TITLE: Prejudice
>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I removed that loophole in the second line of the proposal.
I change my vote to FOR.
; 6699 1 1.0 comex Purple Proposal
FOR
> 6700 1 1.0 comex Purple Proposal
FOR
> 6701 1 1.0 comex Purple Proposal
FOR
> 6702 1 2.0 coppro Purple Fun While They Lasted
FOR
> 6703 1 2.0 coppro Purple We Have No Protectorates
AGAINST (nee
3.0 coppro Purple Rewards
FOR
> 6711 1 1.0 coppro Purple Democracy Cannot Be Justified
AGAINST (not if the proposals are [illegally] Disinterested)
> 6712 0 3.0 comex Purple
FOR
1 - 100 of 1561 matches
Mail list logo
