Re: BUS: If at first you don't succeed...

2008-11-16 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/11/17 Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The question is, does the "so" in the second sentence refer to > "deregister[ing]" or to "deregister[ing] by announcement?" If the latter, > then even deregistrations by means of a Cantus Cygneus trigger a thirty day > window. > > -- > > Elysion >

Re: BUS: If at first you don't succeed...

2008-11-16 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:58:21 -0500 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On behalf of P1: P1 registers. ... > On behalf of P100: P100 registers. I initiate an inquiry case on the following statement, disqualifying comex: None of the attempted registrations (P1 through P100) in comex's quoted messag

Re: BUS: If at first you don't succeed...

2008-11-16 Thread Charles Reiss
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 16:30, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > woggle wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 15:58, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [snip] >>> On behalf of P100: P100 registers. >> >> I intend with 2 support to initiate a criminal case against comex for >> violating rule 174

Re: BUS: If at first you don't succeed...

2008-11-16 Thread Ed Murphy
woggle wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 15:58, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] >> On behalf of P100: P100 registers. > > I intend with 2 support to initiate a criminal case against comex for > violating rule 1742 by violating the P100 contract by causing P100 to > register with the same

Re: BUS: If at first you don't succeed...

2008-11-16 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 16:23:54 -0800 "Charles Reiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 15:58, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] > > On behalf of P100: P100 registers. > > I intend with 2 support to initiate a criminal case against comex for > violating rule 1742 by violat

Re: BUS: If at first you don't succeed...

2008-11-16 Thread Charles Reiss
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 15:58, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > On behalf of P100: P100 registers. I intend with 2 support to initiate a criminal case against comex for violating rule 1742 by violating the P100 contract by causing P100 to register with the same basis as another player. -

BUS: If at first you don't succeed...

2008-11-16 Thread comex
On behalf of P1: P1 registers. On behalf of P2: P2 registers. On behalf of P3: P3 registers. On behalf of P4: P4 registers. On behalf of P5: P5 registers. On behalf of P6: P6 registers. On behalf of P7: P7 registers. On behalf of P8: P8 registers. On behalf of P9: P9 registers. On behalf of P10: P1