ais523 wrote:
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 21:37 +, FKA441344 wrote:
If I judged case 3172 FALSE, I intend to appeal it with two support,
on the grounds that the judgement I assigned to it was intended for
case 3173.
I support and do so.
Ineffective, the two-week limit has passed.
Proposal: A
On Sun, 2012-03-11 at 21:37 +, FKA441344 wrote:
> If I judged case 3172 FALSE, I intend to appeal it with two support,
> on the grounds that the judgement I assigned to it was intended for
> case 3173.
I support and do so.
--
ais523
FKA441344 wrote:
If possible, I file a motion to reconsider case 3172. Hasn't the time
limit for that expired though?
I support. But yes, it has. (At least the nature of the error is noted
in the DB.)
FKA441344 wrote:
If I judged case 3172 FALSE, I intend to appeal it with two support,
on the grounds that the judgement I assigned to it was intended for
case 3173.
I support.
PF
-- Forwarded message --
From: FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement of 3173, intent to appeal 3172,
support for intent to appeal 3151, and support for intents to make
cases notable
To: agora-d
If I have not yet judged case 3173, I judge it as follows:
Per cases 3170 and 3154, I judge this case FALSE.
If I judged case 3172 FALSE, I intend to appeal it with two support,
on the grounds that the judgement I assigned to it was intended for
case 3173.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Ed Murp
